Physics/Essays/Fedosin/Gravitational characteristic impedance of free space: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Fedosin
No edit summary
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 13:27, 26 January 2025

Gravitational characteristic impedance of free space, ρg0  is a physical constant that according to Maxwell-like gravitational equations relates magnitudes of gravitational field strength Γ and gravitational torsion field Ω in gravitational radiation travelling through free space:

ρg0=μg0εg=4πGc=μg0ΓΩ=2.7966961018m2/(skg). 

where εg=14πG=1.192708109kgs2m3 is gravitoelectric gravitational constant in the set of selfconsistent gravitational constants, G is gravitational constant, c is speed of light, μg0=4πGc2=9.3287721027m/kg  is gravitomagnetic gravitational constant.

As in electromagnetism, the characteristic impedance of free space plays a central role in all radiation problems, such as in a comparison of the radiation resistance of gravity-wave antennas to the value of this impedance in order to estimate the coupling efficiency of these antennas to free space. The numerical value of this impedance is extremely small, but the impedance of all material objects must be “impedance matched” to this extremely small quantity before significant power can be transferred efficiently from gravitational waves to these detectors.

The gravitational characteristic impedance of free space may be connected with other constants:

ρg0=2αhmS2, 

where h  is the Planck constant, α=e22ε0hc is the fine structure constant for the elementary charge e , ε0 is the electric constant, mS=eεgε0=e4πGε0  is the Stoney mass.

The gravitational characteristic impedance of free space for the atoms and nucleons level of matter is:

ρs=4πGsc=6.3461021m2/(skg), 

where Gs=e24πε0mpme is the strong gravitational constant, mp and me are the masses of proton and electron.

History

Due to McDonald [1] first who used Maxwell equations to describe gravity was Oliver Heaviside. [2] The point is that in the weak gravitational field the standard theory of gravity could be written in the form of Maxwell-like gravitational equations. [3]

In the 80-ties Maxwell-like equations were considered in the Wald book of general relativity. [4] In the 90-ties Kraus [5] first introduced the gravitational characteristic impedance of free space, which was detailed later by Kiefer [6], and now by Raymond Y. Chiao, [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] who is developing the ways of experimental determination of the gravitational waves.

Typical gravitational impedance at the megascopic scale

In the general case only planets (with their sattelites) and stars could be considered "as free, as possible" to be used as some "antenna" to the gravitational waves detection. Spherical megascopic bodies have the folloving characteristic impedance:

ρgsvr3m, 

where

v  is the equatorial velocity,
r  is the spherical body radius and
m  is the body mass.
Solar planetary system
Object Radius, m Equator velocity, m/s Mass, kg Impedance ρgs/ρg0 
Human 2 1 100 6.67103 2.381015
Sun 6.96108 317.4 1.9891030 3.7021020 1.32ˑ10–2
Mercury 2.425106 2.99 3.3111023 7.31018 2.61100
Venus 6.07106 1.807 4.871024 7.5081019 2.68101
Earth 6.371106 465 5.9761024 1.6521016 5.9101
Mars 3.395106 240.6 6.4241023 4.2391016 1.516102
Jupiter 7.13107 12644 1.8991027 1.5821016 5.66101
Saturn 6.01107 10248 5.6861026 3.6111016 1.291102
Uranus 2.45107 3952 8.6891025 3.7141016 1.328102
Neptune 2.51107 2771 1.031026 2.2511016 8.05101

Planetary data were taken from the textbook. [12] As could be seen from the Table, only the Mercury has characteristic impedance close to the free space value.

Planet's satellites
Object Radius, m Equator velocity, m/s Mass, kg Impedance ρgs/ρg0 
Moon 1.738107 4.36 7.351022 3.4371017 1.23101
Titan 2.44107 276.8 1.371023 1.6431015 5.875102
Ganymede 2.6107 1116 1.541023 6.281015 12.245103
Callisto 2.36106 252.7 9.51022 2.0921017 7.48102

Satellites' data were taken from the textbook. [12] As could be seen from the Table, only the Moon has the closest value of characteristic impedance about 12-times greater then for free space.

Stars
Object Radius, m Equator velocity, m/s Mass, kg Impedance ρgs/ρg0 
Sun 6.96108 317.4 1.9891030 3.7021020 1.32102
O5 1.2381010 4105 7.9181031 2.0841017 7.45100
F5 5.5281010 1105 1.9891030 9.2651016 3.31102
Globular cluster 4.6281017 6104 1.9891037 4.6541016 1.66102

In this table designations "O5" and "F5" define stellar types. [12] As it is seen from the Table, some stars could have characteristic impedance value about the same as the impedance of free space.

See also

References

Template:Reflist

  1. K.T. McDonald, Am. J. Phys. 65, 7 (1997) 591-2.
  2. O. Heaviside, Electromagnetic Theory (”The Electrician” Printing and Publishing Co., London, 1894) pp. 455-465.
  3. W. K. H. Panofsky and M. Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1955), p. 168, 166.
  4. R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).
  5. J. D. Kraus, IEEE Antennas and Propagation. Magazine 33, 21 (1991).
  6. C. Kiefer and C. Weber, Annalen der Physik (Leipzig) 14, 253 (2005).
  7. Raymond Y. Chiao. "Conceptual tensions between quantum mechanics and general relativity: Are there experimental consequences, e.g., superconducting transducers between electromagnetic and gravitational radiation?" arXiv:gr-qc/0208024v3 (2002). [PDF
  8. R.Y. Chiao and W.J. Fitelson. Time and matter in the interaction between gravity and quantum fluids: are there macroscopic quantum transducers between gravitational and electromagnetic waves? In Proceedings of the “Time & Matter Conference” (2002 August 11-17; Venice, Italy), ed. I. Bigi and M. Faessler (Singapore: World Scientific, 2006), p. 85. arXiv: gr-qc/0303089. PDF
  9. R.Y. Chiao. Conceptual tensions between quantum mechanics and general relativity: are there experimental consequences? In Science and Ultimate Reality, ed. J.D. Barrow, P.C.W. Davies, and C.L.Harper, Jr. (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 254. arXiv:gr-qc/0303100.
  10. Raymond Y. Chiao. "New directions for gravitational wave physics via “Millikan oil drops” arXiv:gr-qc/0610146v16 (2009). PDF
  11. Stephen Minter, Kirk Wegter-McNelly, and Raymond Chiao. Do Mirrors for Gravitational Waves Exist? arXiv:gr-qc/0903.0661v10 (2009). PDF
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Allen C.W.(1973). Astrophysical quantities. 3-d edition. University of London, The Athlone Press.