Introduction to graph theory/Proof of Theorem 5

From testwiki
Revision as of 03:10, 12 January 2016 by imported>MaintenanceBot (Changing category from School of Mathematics to CourseCat.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Nav2

Statement

A tree of order n has n1 edges.

Corollary of

Theorem 4:For a graph G, the following are equivalent:

  • G is a tree
  • G is a minimal connected graph, in the sense that the removal of any edge will leave a disconnected graph.
  • G is a maximal acyclic graph, in the sense that the addition of any missing edge will create a cycle.

Proof

For n=1, all graphs have 0=n1 edges. For n=2, there are two graphs, one with an edge and one without. The graph without an edge is disconnected, and therefore is not a tree, whereas the one with an edge is connected and has no cycles and therefore is a tree.

For n=3, there are 4 graphs, one each with 0, 1, 2 or 3 edges. The graphs with 0 and 1 edges are disconnected, while the graph with 3 edges has a cycle. The graph with 2 edges is connected and has no cycle, so the theorem is proved for n3.

Now suppose we have proved this theorem for all n<k, and let T be a tree of order k. Remove an edge e from T to form a new graph Te. By Theorem 4, T is a minimal connected graph, and hence Te is disconnected. Any connected component of Te (by the connectedness of T) must have one of the vertices of e in it, and hence Te has exactly two components.

The two components are connected, and have no cycles, and are therefore trees. Let there be n1,n2 vertices in the two components of Te. Then n1+n2=k. Further, there are n11,n21 edges in the components, so Te has k2 edges in total. Therefore, putting edge e back into the graph, T has k1 edges.

Comments

Template:CourseCat