PlanetPhysics/Derivation of Cohomology Group Theorem
Introduction
Let be a general CW-complex and consider the set of basepoint preserving [[../HomotopyCategory/|homotopy classes of maps]] from to Eilenberg-MacLane spaces for , with being an [[../TrivialGroupoid/|Abelian group]].
\begin{theorem}(Fundamental, [or reduced] cohomology \htmladdnormallink{theorem {http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Formula.html}, [1]}).
There exists a natural [[../TrivialGroupoid/|group]] [[../IsomorphicObjectsUnderAnIsomorphism/|isomorphism]]:
for all CW-complexes , with any Abelian group and all . Such a group isomorphism has the form for a certain distinguished class in the cohomology group , (called a ""fundamental class ).
\end{theorem}
Derivation of the cohomology group theorem for connected CW-complexes.
For connected CW-complexes, , the set of basepoint preserving [[../ThinEquivalence/|homotopy]] classes maps from to Eilenberg-MacLane spaces is replaced by the set of non-basepointed homotopy classes , for an Abelian group and all , because every map can be homotoped to take basepoint to basepoint, and also every homotopy between basepoint -preserving maps can be homotoped to be basepoint-preserving when the image space is simply-connected.
Therefore, the natural group isomorphism in {\mathbf Eq. (0.1)} becomes:
When the above group isomorphism results immediately from the condition that is an Abelian group. [[../LQG2/|QED]] {\mathbf Remarks.}
- A direct but very tedious proof of the (reduced) cohomology theorem can be obtained by constructing maps and homotopies cell-by-cell.
- An alternative, categorical derivation via [[../GroupoidSymmetries/|duality]] and generalization of the proof of the cohomology group theorem ([2]) is possible by employing the categorical definitions of a limit, colimit/cocone, the definition of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces (as specified under related), and by verification of the axioms for reduced [[../CohomologyTheoryOnCWComplexes/|cohomology groups]] (pp. 142-143 in Ch.19 and p. 172 of ref. [2]).
This also raises the interesting question of the [[../Predicate/|propositions]] that hold for [[../AbelianCategory3/|non-Abelian]] groups G, and generalized [[../NoncommutativeGeometry4/|cohomology theories]].
\begin{thebibliography} {9}