Measure Theory/Properties of Nonnegative Integrals

From testwiki
Revision as of 21:06, 1 January 2024 by imported>Addemf
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Properties of Nonnegative Integrals

Throughout this lesson you may assume that

  • E
  • f,g:E0 are measurable, nonnegative functions
  • c,d

Recall the definition of a nonnegative integral,

Ef=supEh where the supremum is taken over all functions h:E which are bounded and λ({xE:h(x)0})<.

Several of the basic properties of nonnegative integrals are familiar from the lesson on bounded integrals. Consistency, linearity, order-preserving.

Notice that it makes no sense to talk about theorems which have to do with absolute values, such as the triangle inequality, since the function and therefore the integral are nonnegative, and hence equal to their own absolute value.

We then prove what might debatably be the most essential theorem in all of measure theory, the monotone convergence theorem. It will be helpful to first prove Fatou's lemma.

It will turn out that in later studies, Fatou's lemma takes on a life of its own, so to speak.

Consistency

We yet again have conflicting definitions of the integral. This time, if λ(E)< and f:E is bounded and measurable and nonnegative, then Ef could mean either the bounded integral or the nonnegative integral. In this subsection, we will understand that Ef refers to the nonnegative integral, and therefore we use the notation (B)Ef to refer to the bounded integral.

Exercise 1. Bounded-Nonnegative Consistency

Prove that Ef=(B)Ef for any function f as described above. The style of proof should be very similar to that used for Prove Simple-Bounded Consistency.

Linearity and Order Preserving

Exercise 1. Prove Linearity and Order Preserving

Prove linearity and order preserving. The proof should be very similar in style to the one given for bounded integrals.

Fatou's Lemma

Let fn be a sequence of nonnegative measurable functions and fnp.w.f on a set E, then Fatou's lemma states

Eflim_Efn

It suffices to prove that lim_Efn is an upper bound on the set of all Eh where hf is bounded, and is nonzero only a finite-measure set.

For any such h, we will construct a new sequence of functions which runs somewhat "in parallel" with the sequence fn.

hn=min{h,fn}

so that therefore hnfn and therefore EhnEfn and therefore lim_Ehnlim_Efn.

Exercise 2. Why Liminf?

In the last step above, we took the limit inferior of both sides of an inequality. Why did we not simply take the limit?

Hint: It has to do with the fact that the sequence of infima is a necessarily increasing sequence, for any "source" sequence. It also has to do with the fact that each term in this particular sequence is necessarily nonnegative.

Exercise 3. Prove Fatou's

Prove Fatou's lemma by the following steps.

1. Prove that for any fixed xE the limit limnhn(x)=h(x).

2. Apply the Bounded Convergence Theorem.

3. Use the fact that when a limit exists, it must equal its limit inferior.

Monotone Convergence Theorem

The monotone convergence theorem has the same set of assumptions as Fatou's lemma, but then further imposes the assumption that the sequence is monotonically increasing:

  • fnfn+1 for each 1n

It then states that therefore the swaparoo follows:

limnEfn=Ef

Exercise 4. Prove the MCT

Prove the MCT. An immediate and instinctive application of Fatou's lemma is a great first step.

Now use the fact that the sequence is increasing, to infer that

limEfnEf

and then conclude the theorem.





Template:CourseCat