Complex Analysis/Identity Theorem

From testwiki
Revision as of 13:33, 23 January 2025 by imported>Eshaa2024 (Statement)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Identity Theorem is a statement about holomorphic functions, asserting that they are uniquely determined under relatively weak conditions.

Statement

Let U be a domain. For two holomorphic functions f,g:U, the following are equivalent:

(1) f=g (i.e., f(x)=g(x) for all xU)

(2) There exists a z0U such that f(n)(z0)=g(n)(z0) for all n.

(3) The set {zU:f(z)=g(z) }has a limit point in U.

Proof

By considering fg, we may assume without loss of generality that g=0. Equivalently, the proof is reduced to showing the following three statements:

  • (N1) f=0 (i.e., f(x)=0 for all xU)
  • (N2) There exists a z0U such that f(n)(z0)=0 for all n.
  • (N3) The zero set Nf:=zU:f(z)=0 has a limit point in U.

Proof Type

The equivalence is proven using a cyclic implication: (1)(2)(3)(1)

Proof (N1 to N2)

(N1) (N2) is obvious, as all derivatives of the zero function f are zero.

Proof (N2 to N3)

Assume (N2). Consider the power series expansion f(z)=n=0an(zz0)n in Br(z0) with r>0. Here, an=f(n)(z0)n!=0 for all n. Thus, f|Br(z0)=0, and (N3) follows.

Proof (N3 to N1) – Contradiction Proof

The step (N3) (N1) is proven by contradiction. Assume the zero set has a limit point and f is not the zero function.

Proof 1 - (N3 to N1) - Power Series Expansion at Limit Point

Assume (N3), i.e., the set Nf of zeros of f has a limit point z0U. Thus, there exists a sequence (zn)U with znz0 and f(zn)=0 as well as znz0 for all n. Let f(z)=n=0an(zz0)n be the power series expansion of f around z0.

Proof 2 - (N3 to N1) - Power Series Expansion

Suppose there exists n with an0. Due to the well-ordering property of , there would also be a smallest such n. Then

f(z)=(zz0)nk=0an+k(zz0)k,|zz0|<r,an0

Proof 3 - (N3 to N1) - Power Series Evaluation

For each i, we have

0=f(zi)=(ziz0)nk=0an+k(ziz0)k

Proof 4 - (N3 to N1) - Limit Process

Since ziz0 and limizi=z0, we get

0=k=0an+k(ziz0)kan,i

As an+k(ziz0)k0 for all k>0 as i. This contradicts an0. Therefore, an=0 for all n, and hence f(n)(z0)=0 for all n, i.e., (N2) holds.

Proof 5 - (N3 to N1) - V is Closed

If (N2) holds, set V:=n0zU,|,f(n)(z)=0. V is closed in U as the intersection of closed sets, because the f(n) are continuous, and preimages of closed sets (here 0) are closed.

Proof 6 - (N3 to N1) - V is Open

V is also open in U, as for every wV, the power series expansion of f around w vanishes. Thus, f is locally zero around w. Since z0V, V is non-empty, and hence V=U due to the connectedness of U.

Proof 7 - From (N1)-(N3) to (1)-(3)

The statement of the Identity Theorem (1)-(3) follows for arbitrary g:U and h:U, by applying (N1)-(N3) to f:=gh.

See Also

Page Information

This learning resource can be presented as a Wiki2Reveal slides

Wiki2Reveal

The Wiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.

Translation and Version Control

This page was translated based on the following Wikiversity source page and uses the concept of Translation and Version Control for a transparent language fork in a Wikiversity:


de:Kurs:Funktionentheorie/Identitätssatz