PlanetPhysics/Quantum Operator Algebras in QFT2: Difference between revisions
imported>MaintenanceBot m Formatting |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 03:42, 13 September 2020
\newcommand{\sqdiagram}[9]{Failed to parse (unknown function "\diagram"): {\displaystyle \diagram #1 \rto^{#2} \dto_{#4}& \eqno{\mbox{#9}}} }
Introduction
This is a topic entry that introduces [[../Groupoid/|quantum operator algebras]] and presents concisely the important roles they play in quantum field theories.
Quantum operator algebras (QOA) in quantum field theories are defined as the algebras of [[../QuantumSpinNetworkFunctor2/|observable]] [[../QuantumOperatorAlgebra4/|operators]], and as such, they are also related to the von Neumann algebra;
quantum operators are usually defined on [[../NormInducedByInnerProduct/|Hilbert spaces]], or in some QFTs on [[../HilbertBundle/|Hilbert space bundles]] or other similar families of spaces.
\htmladdnormallink{representations {http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CategoricalGroupRepresentation.html} of Banach -algebras}-- that are defined on Hilbert spaces-- are closely related to C* -algebra representations which provide a useful approach to defining [[../SUSY2/|quantum space-times]].
Quantum operator algebras in quantum field theories: QOA Role in QFTs
Important examples of quantum operators are: the [[../HamiltonianOperator3/|Hamiltonian operator]] (or [[../Hamiltonian2/|Schr\"odinger operator]]), the [[../Position/|position]] and [[../Momentum/|momentum]] operators, Casimir operators, unitary operators and [[../QuarkAntiquarkPair/|spin]] operators. The observable operators are also self-adjoint . More general operators were recently defined, such as Prigogine's superoperators.
Another development in quantum theories was the introduction of Frech\'et nuclear spaces or `[[../I3/|rigged' Hilbert spaces]] (Hilbert space bundles ). The following [[../IsomorphicObjectsUnderAnIsomorphism/|sections]] define several [[../Bijective/|types]] of quantum operator algebras that provide the foundation of modern quantum field theories in [[../PhysicalMathematics2/|mathematical physics]].
Quantum groups; quantum operator algebras and related symmetries.
Quantum theories adopted a new lease of life post 1955 when von Neumann beautifully re-formulated [[../QuantumParadox/|quantum mechanics]] ([[../FTNIR/|QM]]) and quantum theories (QT) in the mathematically rigorous context of Hilbert spaces and operator algebras defined over such spaces. From a current physics perspective, von Neumann' s approach to quantum mechanics has however done much more: it has not only paved the way to expanding the role of symmetry in physics, as for example with the Wigner-Eckhart [[../Formula/|theorem]] and its applications, but also revealed the fundamental importance in quantum physics of the [[../StableAutomaton/|state space]] geometry of quantum operator algebras.
Basic mathematical definitions in QOA:
- Von Neumann algebra
- Hopf algebra
- Groupoids
- Haar systems associated to measured groupoids or \htmladdnormallink{locally compact groupoids {http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/LocallyCompactGroupoid.html}.}
- [[../VonNeumannAlgebra2/|C*-algebras]] and [[../WeakHopfAlgebra/|quantum groupoids]] entry (attached).
Von Neumann algebra
Let denote a complex (separable) Hilbert space. A von Neumann algebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} acting on is a subset of the algebra of all bounded operators Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} such that:
- (i) Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is closed under the adjoint [[../Cod/|operation]] (with the adjoint of an element denoted by ).
- (ii) Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} equals its [[../CoordinateSpace/|bicommutant]], namely:
Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A= \{A \in \cL(\mathbb{H}) : \forall B \in \cL(\mathbb{H}), \forall C\in \A,~ (BC=CB)\Rightarrow (AB=BA)\}. }
If one calls a [[../CoordinateSpace/|commutant]] of a set Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} the special set of bounded operators on Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} which [[../Commutator/|commute]] with all elements in Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} , then this second condition implies that the commutant of the commutant of Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is again the set Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} .
On the other hand, a von Neumann algebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} inherits a unital subalgebra from Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} , and according to the first condition in its definition Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} , it does indeed inherit a -subalgebra structure as further explained in the next section on C* -algebras. Furthermore, one also has available a notable bicommutant theorem which states that: {\em Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is a von Neumann algebra if and only if Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is a -subalgebra of Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} , closed for the smallest topology defined by continuous maps for all where denotes the inner product defined on }~.
For a well-presented treatment of the geometry of the state spaces of quantum operator algebras, the reader is referred to Aflsen and Schultz (2003; [1]).
Hopf algebra
First, a unital associative algebra consists of a linear space together with two linear maps:
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle m &: A \otimes A \lra A~,~(multiplication) \\ \eta &: \bC \lra A~,~ (unity) }
satisfying the conditions
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle m(m \otimes \mathbf 1) &= m (\mathbf 1 \otimes m) \\ m(\mathbf 1 \otimes \eta) &= m (\eta \otimes \mathbf 1) = \ID~. }
This first condition can be seen in terms of a commuting [[../TrivialGroupoid/|diagram]]~:
Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{CD}"): {\displaystyle \begin{CD} A \otimes A \otimes A @> m \otimes \ID>> A \otimes A \\ @V \ID \otimes mVV @VV m V \\ A \otimes A @ > m >> A \end{CD} }
Next suppose we consider `reversing the arrows', and take an algebra equipped with a linear homorphisms Failed to parse (unknown function "\lra"): {\displaystyle \Delta : A \lra A \otimes A<math>, satisfying, for } a,b \in A</math> :
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \Delta(ab) &= \Delta(a) \Delta(b) \\ (\Delta \otimes \ID) \Delta &= (\ID \otimes \Delta) \Delta~. }
We call a comultiplication , which is said to be coasociative in so far that the following diagram commutes
Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{CD}"): {\displaystyle \begin{CD} A \otimes A \otimes A @< \Delta\otimes \ID<< A \otimes A \\ @A \ID \otimes \Delta AA @AA \Delta A \\ A \otimes A @ < \Delta << A \end{CD} }
There is also a counterpart to , the counity map Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle \vep : A \lra \bC} satisfying
Failed to parse (unknown function "\ID"): {\displaystyle (\ID \otimes \vep) \circ \Delta = (\vep \otimes \ID) \circ \Delta = \ID~. }
A bialgebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle (A, m, \Delta, \eta,\vep)} is a linear space with maps Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle m, \Delta, \eta, \vep} satisfying the above properties.
Now to recover anything resembling a [[../TrivialGroupoid/|group]] structure, we must append such a bialgebra with an antihomomorphism Failed to parse (unknown function "\lra"): {\displaystyle S : A \lra A} , satisfying , for ~. This map is defined implicitly via the property~:
Failed to parse (unknown function "\ID"): {\displaystyle m(S \otimes \ID) \circ \Delta = m(\ID \otimes S) \circ \Delta = \eta \circ \vep~~. }
We call the antipode map .
A Hopf algebra is then a bialgebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle (A,m, \eta, \Delta, \vep)} equipped with an antipode map .
Commutative and [[../AbelianCategory3/|non-commutative]] Hopf algebras form the backbone of [[../QuantumGroup4/|quantum `groups]]' and are essential to the generalizations of symmetry. Indeed, in most respects a quantum `group' is closely related to its dual Hopf algebra; in the case of a finite, commutative quantum group its dual Hopf algebra is obtained via Fourier transformation of the group elements. When Hopf algebras are actually associated with their dual, proper groups of [[../Matrix/|matrices]], there is considerable scope for their representations on both finite and infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces.
Groupoids
Recall that a groupoid Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} is, loosely speaking, a [[../Cod/|small category]] with inverses over its set of [[../TrivialGroupoid/|objects]] Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle X = Ob(\grp)} ~. One often writes Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp^y_x} for the set of [[../TrivialGroupoid/|morphisms]] in Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} from to ~. A [[../GroupoidHomomorphism2/|topological groupoid]] consists of a space Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} , a distinguished subspace Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp^{(0)} = \obg \subset \grp} , called {\it the space of objects} of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} , together with maps
Failed to parse (unknown function "\xymatrix"): {\displaystyle r,s~:~ \xymatrix{ \grp \ar@<1ex>[r]^r \ar[r]_s & \grp^{(0)} } }
called the {\it range} and {\it [[../SmallCategory/|source maps]]} respectively,
together with a law of [[../Cod/|composition]]
Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \circ~:~ \grp^{(2)}: = \grp \times_{\grp^{(0)}} \grp = \{ ~(\gamma_1, \gamma_2) \in \grp \times \grp ~:~ s(\gamma_1) = r(\gamma_2)~ \}~ \lra ~\grp~, }
such that the following hold~:~
\item[(1)] (\gamma_1, \gamma_2) \in \grp^{(2)}</math>~.
\item[(2)] ~, for all Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle x \in \grp^{(0)}} ~.
\item[(3)] \gamma \in \grp</math>~.
\item[(4)] ~.
\item[(5)] Each has a two--sided inverse with ~. Furthermore, only for topological groupoids the inverse map needs be continuous. It is usual to call Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp^{(0)} = Ob(\grp)} {\it the set of objects} of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} ~. For Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle u \in Ob(\grp)} , the set of arrows Failed to parse (unknown function "\lra"): {\displaystyle u \lra u} forms a group Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_u} , called the isotropy group of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} at .
Thus, as it is well kown, a topological groupoid is just a groupoid internal to the [[../Cod/|category]] of [[../CoIntersections/|topological]] spaces and continuous maps. The notion of internal groupoid has proved significant in a number of [[../CosmologicalConstant/|fields]], since groupoids generalise bundles of groups, group actions, and [[../TrivialGroupoid/|equivalence relations]]. For a further study of groupoids we refer the reader to Brown (2006).
Several examples of groupoids are:
- (a) locally compact groups, transformation groups , and any group in general (e.g. [59]
- (b) equivalence relations
- (c) tangent bundles
- (d) the [[../MoyalDeformation/|tangent groupoid]]
- (e) holonomy groupoids for foliations
- (f) Poisson groupoids
- (g) [[../Cod/|graph]] groupoids.
As a simple, helpful example of a groupoid, consider (b) above. Thus, let R be an equivalence [[../Bijective/|relation]] on a set X. Then R is a groupoid under the following operations: . Here, Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp^0 = X } , (the diagonal of ) and .
Therefore, = . When , R is called a trivial groupoid. A special case of a [[../TrivialGroupoid/|trivial groupoid]] is . (So every i is equivalent to every j ). Identify with the matrix unit . Then the groupoid is just [[../Matrix/|matrix multiplication]] except that we only multiply when , and . We do not really lose anything by restricting the multiplication, since the pairs excluded from groupoid multiplication just give the 0 product in normal algebra anyway. For a groupoid Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} to be a locally compact groupoid means that Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} is required to be a (second countable) [[../LocallyCompactHausdorffSpaces/|locally compact Hausdorff space]], and the product and also inversion maps are required to be continuous. Each Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}^u} as well as the unit space Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}^0} is closed in Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} . What replaces the left [[../HigherDimensionalQuantumAlgebroid/|Haar measure]] on Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} is a [[../SimilarityAndAnalogousSystemsDynamicAdjointnessAndTopologicalEquivalence/|system]] of measures (Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle u \in \grp_{lc}^0} ), where is a positive [[../CoIntersections/|regular]] Borel measure on Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}^u} with dense support. In addition, the 's are required to vary continuously (when integrated against Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle f \in C_c(\grp_{lc}))} and to form an invariant family in the sense that for each x, the map is a measure preserving [[../TrivialGroupoid/|homeomorphism]] from Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}^s(x)} onto Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}^r(x)} . Such a system is called a left Haar system for the locally compact groupoid Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} .
This is defined more precisely in the next subsection.
Haar systems for locally compact topological groupoids
Let
Failed to parse (unknown function "\xymatrix"): {\displaystyle \xymatrix{ \grp \ar@<1ex>[r]^r \ar[r]_s & \grp^{(0)}}=X }
be a locally compact, locally trivial topological groupoid with its transposition into transitive (connected) components. Recall that for , the costar of denoted is defined as the closed set Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \bigcup\{ \grp(y,x) : y \in \grp \}} , whereby
Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp(x_0, y_0) \hookrightarrow \rm{CO}^*(x) \lra X~, }
is a principal Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp(x_0, y_0)} --bundle relative to fixed base points ~. Assuming all relevant sets are locally compact, then following Seda (1976), a \emph{(left) Haar system on Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} } denoted Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle (\grp, \tau)} (for later purposes), is defined to comprise of i) a measure on Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} , ii) a measure on and iii) a measure on such that for every Baire set of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} , the following hold on setting ~:
\item[(1)] is measurable. \item[(2)] ~. \item[(3)] , for all Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle t \in \grp(x,z)}
and Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle x, z \in \grp}
~.
The presence of a left Haar system on Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} has important topological implications: it requires that the range map Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle r : \grp_{lc} \rightarrow \grp_{lc}^0<math> is open. For such a } \grp_{lc}</math> with a left Haar system, the [[../NormInducedByInnerProduct/|vector space]] Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C_c(\grp_{lc})} is a convolution *--algebra , where for Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle f, g \in C_c(\grp_{lc})} :
with
One has Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C^*(\grp_{lc})} to be the enveloping C*--algebra of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C_c(\grp_{lc})} (and also representations are required to be continuous in the inductive limit topology). Equivalently, it is the completion of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \pi_{univ}(C_c(\grp_{lc}))} where is the universal representation of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} . For example, if Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc} = R_n} , then Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C^*(\grp_{lc})} is just the finite dimensional algebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C_c(\grp_{lc}) = M_n} , the span of the 's.
There exists a measurable [[../HilbertBundle/|Hilbert bundle]] Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle (\grp_{lc}^0, \mathbb{H}, \mu)} with Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \mathbb{H} = \left\{ \mathbb{H}^u_{u \in \grp_{lc}^0} \right\}<math> and a G-representation L on } \H</math>. Then, for every pair of [[../PiecewiseLinear/|square]] integrable sections of , it is required that the [[../Bijective/|function]] \nu\Phi</math> of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C_c(\grp_{lc})} is then given by:\\ .
The triple is called a \textit{measurable Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} --Hilbert bundle}.
All Sources
[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29]
References
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedAS2k3 - ↑ E. M. Alfsen and F. W. Schultz: \emph{Geometry of State Spaces of Operator Algebras}, Birkhauser, Boston--Basel--Berlin (2003).
- ↑ I. Baianu : Categories, Functors and Automata Theory: A Novel Approach to Quantum Automata through Algebraic--Topological Quantum Computations., Proceed. 4th Intl. Congress LMPS , (August-Sept. 1971).
- ↑ I.C. Baianu, N. Boden and D. Lightowlers.1981. NMR Spin--Echo Responses of Dipolar--Coupled Spin--1/2 Triads in Solids., J. Magnetic Resonance , 43 :101--111.
- ↑ I. C. Baianu, J. F. Glazebrook and R. Brown.: A Non--Abelian, Categorical Ontology of Spacetimes and Quantum Gravity., Axiomathes 17 ,(3-4): 353-408(2007).
- ↑ F.A. Bais, B. J. Schroers and J. K. Slingerland: Broken quantum symmetry and confinement phases in planar physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 No. 18 (1--4): 181-201 (2002).
- ↑ J.W. Barrett.: Geometrical measurements in three-dimensional quantum gravity. Proceedings of the Tenth Oporto Meeting on Geometry, Topology and Physics (2001). Intl. J. Modern Phys. A 18 , October, suppl., 97-113 (2003)
- ↑ M. Chaician and A. Demichev: Introduction to Quantum Groups , World Scientific (1996).
- ↑ Coleman and De Luccia: Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay., Phys. Rev. D 21 : 3305 (1980).
- ↑ A. Connes: Noncommutative Geometry , Academic Press 1994.
- ↑ L. Crane and I.B. Frenkel. Four-dimensional topological quantum field theory, Hopf categories, and the canonical bases. Topology and physics. J. Math. Phys . 35 (no. 10): 5136-5154 (1994).
- ↑ W. Drechsler and P. A. Tuckey: On quantum and parallel transport in a Hilbert bundle over spacetime., Classical and Quantum Gravity, 13 :611--632 (1996). doi: 10.1088/0264--9381/13/4/004
- ↑ V. G. Drinfel'd: Quantum groups, In \emph{Proc. Int. Cong. of Mathematicians, Berkeley 1986}, (ed. A. Gleason), Berkeley, 798--820 (1987).
- ↑ G. J. Ellis: Higher dimensional crossed modules of algebras, J. of Pure Appl. Algebra 52 (1988), 277--282.
- ↑ P.. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko, Solutions of the Quantum Dynamical Yang-Baxter Equation and Dynamical Quantum Groups, Comm.Math.Phys., 196: 591-640 (1998)
- ↑ P. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko: Exchange dynamical quantum groups, Commun. Math. Phys. 205 (1): 19--52 (1999)
- ↑ P. I. Etingof and O. Schiffmann: Lectures on the dynamical Yang--Baxter equations, in Quantum Groups and Lie Theory (Durham, 1999) , pp. 89--129, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
- ↑ B. Fauser: A treatise on quantum Clifford Algebras. Konstanz, Habilitationsschrift. (2002).
- ↑ B. Fauser: Grade Free product Formulae from Grassman--Hopf Gebras. Ch. 18 in R. Ablamowicz, Ed., Clifford Algebras: Applications to Mathematics, Physics and Engineering , Birkh\"{a}user: Boston, Basel and Berlin, (2004).
- ↑ J. M. G. Fell. 1960. "The Dual Spaces of C*--Algebras.", {\em Transactions of the American Mathematical Society}, 94 : 365--403 (1960).
- ↑ F.M. Fernandez and E. A. Castro.: (Lie) Algebraic Methods in Quantum Chemistry and Physics. , Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc (1996).
- ↑ R. P. Feynman: Space--Time Approach to Non--Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, {\em Reviews of Modern Physics}, 20: 367-387 (1948). [It is also reprinted in (Schwinger 1958).]
- ↑ A.~Fr{\"o}hlich, Non-Abelian Homological Algebra. {I . {D}erived functors and satellites.\/}, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 11: 239--252 (1961).
- ↑ Gel'fand, I. and Naimark, M., 1943, On the Imbedding of Normed Rings into the Ring of Operators in Hilbert Space, Recueil Math\'ematique [Matematicheskii Sbornik] Nouvelle S\'erie , 12 [54]: 197-213. [Reprinted in C*-algebras: 1943--1993, in the series Contemporary Mathematics, 167, Providence, R.I. : American Mathematical Society, 1994.]
- ↑ R. Gilmore: "Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and Some of Their Applications." , Dover Publs., Inc.: Mineola and New York, 2005.
- ↑ P. Hahn: Haar measure for measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc . 242 : 1--33(1978).
- ↑ P. Hahn: The regular representations of measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc . 242 :34--72(1978).
- ↑ R. Heynman and S. Lifschitz. 1958. Lie Groups and Lie Algebras ., New York and London: Nelson Press.
- ↑ C. Heunen, N. P. Landsman, B. Spitters.: A topos for algebraic quantum theory, (2008)