PlanetPhysics/Quantum Operator Algebras in QFT2

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

\newcommand{\sqdiagram}[9]{Failed to parse (unknown function "\diagram"): {\displaystyle \diagram #1 \rto^{#2} \dto_{#4}& \eqno{\mbox{#9}}} }

Introduction

This is a topic entry that introduces [[../Groupoid/|quantum operator algebras]] and presents concisely the important roles they play in quantum field theories.

Quantum operator algebras  (QOA) in quantum field theories are defined as the algebras of [[../QuantumSpinNetworkFunctor2/|observable]] [[../QuantumOperatorAlgebra4/|operators]], and as such, they are also related to the von Neumann algebra;

quantum operators are usually defined on [[../NormInducedByInnerProduct/|Hilbert spaces]], or in some QFTs on [[../HilbertBundle/|Hilbert space bundles]] or other similar families of spaces.

\htmladdnormallink{representations {http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CategoricalGroupRepresentation.html} of Banach *-algebras}-- that are defined on Hilbert spaces-- are closely related to C* -algebra representations which provide a useful approach to defining [[../SUSY2/|quantum space-times]].

Quantum operator algebras in quantum field theories: QOA Role in QFTs

Important examples of quantum operators are: the [[../HamiltonianOperator3/|Hamiltonian operator]] (or [[../Hamiltonian2/|Schr\"odinger operator]]), the [[../Position/|position]] and [[../Momentum/|momentum]] operators, Casimir operators, unitary operators and [[../QuarkAntiquarkPair/|spin]] operators. The observable operators are also self-adjoint . More general operators were recently defined, such as Prigogine's superoperators.

Another development in quantum theories was the introduction of Frech\'et nuclear spaces or `[[../I3/|rigged' Hilbert spaces]] (Hilbert space bundles ). The following [[../IsomorphicObjectsUnderAnIsomorphism/|sections]] define several [[../Bijective/|types]] of quantum operator algebras that provide the foundation of modern quantum field theories in [[../PhysicalMathematics2/|mathematical physics]].

Quantum theories adopted a new lease of life post 1955 when von Neumann beautifully re-formulated [[../QuantumParadox/|quantum mechanics]] ([[../FTNIR/|QM]]) and quantum theories (QT) in the mathematically rigorous context of Hilbert spaces and operator algebras defined over such spaces. From a current physics perspective, von Neumann' s approach to quantum mechanics has however done much more: it has not only paved the way to expanding the role of symmetry in physics, as for example with the Wigner-Eckhart [[../Formula/|theorem]] and its applications, but also revealed the fundamental importance in quantum physics of the [[../StableAutomaton/|state space]] geometry of quantum operator algebras.

Basic mathematical definitions in QOA:

Von Neumann algebra

Let denote a complex (separable) Hilbert space. A von Neumann algebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} acting on is a subset of the algebra of all bounded operators Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} such that:

  • (i) Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is closed under the adjoint [[../Cod/|operation]] (with the adjoint of an element T denoted by T*).
  • (ii) Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} equals its [[../CoordinateSpace/|bicommutant]], namely:

Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A= \{A \in \cL(\mathbb{H}) : \forall B \in \cL(\mathbb{H}), \forall C\in \A,~ (BC=CB)\Rightarrow (AB=BA)\}. }

If one calls a [[../CoordinateSpace/|commutant]] of a set Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} the special set of bounded operators on Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} which [[../Commutator/|commute]] with all elements in Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} , then this second condition implies that the commutant of the commutant of Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is again the set Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} .

On the other hand, a von Neumann algebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} inherits a unital subalgebra from Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} , and according to the first condition in its definition Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} , it does indeed inherit a *-subalgebra structure as further explained in the next section on C* -algebras. Furthermore, one also has available a notable bicommutant theorem which states that: {\em Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is a von Neumann algebra if and only if Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is a *-subalgebra of Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} , closed for the smallest topology defined by continuous maps (ξ,η)(Aξ,η) for all <Aξ,η)> where <.,.> denotes the inner product defined on }~.

For a well-presented treatment of the geometry of the state spaces of quantum operator algebras, the reader is referred to Aflsen and Schultz (2003; [1]).

Hopf algebra

First, a unital associative algebra consists of a linear space A together with two linear maps:

Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle m &: A \otimes A \lra A~,~(multiplication) \\ \eta &: \bC \lra A~,~ (unity) }

satisfying the conditions

Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle m(m \otimes \mathbf 1) &= m (\mathbf 1 \otimes m) \\ m(\mathbf 1 \otimes \eta) &= m (\eta \otimes \mathbf 1) = \ID~. }

This first condition can be seen in terms of a commuting [[../TrivialGroupoid/|diagram]]~:

Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{CD}"): {\displaystyle \begin{CD} A \otimes A \otimes A @> m \otimes \ID>> A \otimes A \\ @V \ID \otimes mVV @VV m V \\ A \otimes A @ > m >> A \end{CD} }

Next suppose we consider `reversing the arrows', and take an algebra A equipped with a linear homorphisms Failed to parse (unknown function "\lra"): {\displaystyle \Delta : A \lra A \otimes A<math>, satisfying, for } a,b \in A</math> :

Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \Delta(ab) &= \Delta(a) \Delta(b) \\ (\Delta \otimes \ID) \Delta &= (\ID \otimes \Delta) \Delta~. }

We call Δ a comultiplication , which is said to be coasociative in so far that the following diagram commutes

Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{CD}"): {\displaystyle \begin{CD} A \otimes A \otimes A @< \Delta\otimes \ID<< A \otimes A \\ @A \ID \otimes \Delta AA @AA \Delta A \\ A \otimes A @ < \Delta << A \end{CD} }

There is also a counterpart to η, the counity map Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle \vep : A \lra \bC} satisfying

Failed to parse (unknown function "\ID"): {\displaystyle (\ID \otimes \vep) \circ \Delta = (\vep \otimes \ID) \circ \Delta = \ID~. }

A bialgebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle (A, m, \Delta, \eta,\vep)} is a linear space A with maps Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle m, \Delta, \eta, \vep} satisfying the above properties.

Now to recover anything resembling a [[../TrivialGroupoid/|group]] structure, we must append such a bialgebra with an antihomomorphism Failed to parse (unknown function "\lra"): {\displaystyle S : A \lra A} , satisfying S(ab)=S(b)S(a), for a,bA~. This map is defined implicitly via the property~:

Failed to parse (unknown function "\ID"): {\displaystyle m(S \otimes \ID) \circ \Delta = m(\ID \otimes S) \circ \Delta = \eta \circ \vep~~. }

We call S the antipode map .

A Hopf algebra is then a bialgebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle (A,m, \eta, \Delta, \vep)} equipped with an antipode map S.

Commutative and [[../AbelianCategory3/|non-commutative]] Hopf algebras form the backbone of [[../QuantumGroup4/|quantum `groups]]' and are essential to the generalizations of symmetry. Indeed, in most respects a quantum `group' is closely related to its dual Hopf algebra; in the case of a finite, commutative quantum group its dual Hopf algebra is obtained via Fourier transformation of the group elements. When Hopf algebras are actually associated with their dual, proper groups of [[../Matrix/|matrices]], there is considerable scope for their representations on both finite and infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces.

Groupoids

Recall that a groupoid Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} is, loosely speaking, a [[../Cod/|small category]] with inverses over its set of [[../TrivialGroupoid/|objects]] Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle X = Ob(\grp)} ~. One often writes Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp^y_x} for the set of [[../TrivialGroupoid/|morphisms]] in Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} from x to y~. A [[../GroupoidHomomorphism2/|topological groupoid]] consists of a space Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} , a distinguished subspace Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp^{(0)} = \obg \subset \grp} , called {\it the space of objects} of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} , together with maps

Failed to parse (unknown function "\xymatrix"): {\displaystyle r,s~:~ \xymatrix{ \grp \ar@<1ex>[r]^r \ar[r]_s & \grp^{(0)} } }

called the {\it range} and {\it [[../SmallCategory/|source maps]]} respectively,

together with a law of [[../Cod/|composition]]

Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \circ~:~ \grp^{(2)}: = \grp \times_{\grp^{(0)}} \grp = \{ ~(\gamma_1, \gamma_2) \in \grp \times \grp ~:~ s(\gamma_1) = r(\gamma_2)~ \}~ \lra ~\grp~, }

such that the following hold~:~

\item[(1)] s(γ1γ2)=r(γ2),r(γ1γ2)=r(γ1)<math>,forall(\gamma_1, \gamma_2) \in \grp^{(2)}</math>~.

\item[(2)] s(x)=r(x)=x~, for all Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle x \in \grp^{(0)}} ~.

\item[(3)] γs(γ)=γ,r(γ)γ=γ<math>,forall\gamma \in \grp</math>~.

\item[(4)] (γ1γ2)γ3=γ1(γ2γ3)~.

\item[(5)] Each γ has a two--sided inverse γ1 with γγ1=r(γ),γ1γ=s(γ)~. Furthermore, only for topological groupoids the inverse map needs be continuous. It is usual to call Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp^{(0)} = Ob(\grp)} {\it the set of objects} of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} ~. For Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle u \in Ob(\grp)} , the set of arrows Failed to parse (unknown function "\lra"): {\displaystyle u \lra u} forms a group Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_u} , called the isotropy group of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} at u .

Thus, as it is well kown, a topological groupoid is just a groupoid internal to the [[../Cod/|category]] of [[../CoIntersections/|topological]] spaces and continuous maps. The notion of internal groupoid has proved significant in a number of [[../CosmologicalConstant/|fields]], since groupoids generalise bundles of groups, group actions, and [[../TrivialGroupoid/|equivalence relations]]. For a further study of groupoids we refer the reader to Brown (2006).

Several examples of groupoids are:

  • (a) locally compact groups, transformation groups , and any group in general (e.g. [59]
  • (b) equivalence relations
  • (c) tangent bundles
  • (d) the [[../MoyalDeformation/|tangent groupoid]]
  • (e) holonomy groupoids for foliations
  • (f) Poisson groupoids
  • (g) [[../Cod/|graph]] groupoids.

As a simple, helpful example of a groupoid, consider (b) above. Thus, let R be an equivalence [[../Bijective/|relation]] on a set X. Then R is a groupoid under the following operations: (x,y)(y,z)=(x,z),(x,y)1=(y,x). Here, Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp^0 = X } , (the diagonal of X×X ) and r((x,y))=x,s((x,y))=y.

Therefore, R2 = {((x,y),(y,z)):(x,y),(y,z)R}. When R=X×X, R is called a trivial groupoid. A special case of a [[../TrivialGroupoid/|trivial groupoid]] is R=Rn={1,2,...,n} × {1,2,...,n}. (So every i is equivalent to every j ). Identify (i,j)Rn with the matrix unit eij. Then the groupoid Rn is just [[../Matrix/|matrix multiplication]] except that we only multiply eij,ekl when k=j, and (eij)1=eji. We do not really lose anything by restricting the multiplication, since the pairs eij,ekl excluded from groupoid multiplication just give the 0 product in normal algebra anyway. For a groupoid Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} to be a locally compact groupoid means that Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} is required to be a (second countable) [[../LocallyCompactHausdorffSpaces/|locally compact Hausdorff space]], and the product and also inversion maps are required to be continuous. Each Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}^u} as well as the unit space Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}^0} is closed in Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} . What replaces the left [[../HigherDimensionalQuantumAlgebroid/|Haar measure]] on Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} is a [[../SimilarityAndAnalogousSystemsDynamicAdjointnessAndTopologicalEquivalence/|system]] of measures λu (Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle u \in \grp_{lc}^0} ), where λu is a positive [[../CoIntersections/|regular]] Borel measure on Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}^u} with dense support. In addition, the λu 's are required to vary continuously (when integrated against Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle f \in C_c(\grp_{lc}))} and to form an invariant family in the sense that for each x, the map yxy is a measure preserving [[../TrivialGroupoid/|homeomorphism]] from Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}^s(x)} onto Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}^r(x)} . Such a system {λu} is called a left Haar system for the locally compact groupoid Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} .

This is defined more precisely in the next subsection.

Haar systems for locally compact topological groupoids

Let

Failed to parse (unknown function "\xymatrix"): {\displaystyle \xymatrix{ \grp \ar@<1ex>[r]^r \ar[r]_s & \grp^{(0)}}=X }

be a locally compact, locally trivial topological groupoid with its transposition into transitive (connected) components. Recall that for xX, the costar of x denoted CO*(x) is defined as the closed set Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \bigcup\{ \grp(y,x) : y \in \grp \}} , whereby

Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp(x_0, y_0) \hookrightarrow \rm{CO}^*(x) \lra X~, }

is a principal Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp(x_0, y_0)} --bundle relative to fixed base points (x0,y0)~. Assuming all relevant sets are locally compact, then following Seda (1976), a \emph{(left) Haar system on Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} } denoted Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle (\grp, \tau)} (for later purposes), is defined to comprise of i) a measure κ on Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} , ii) a measure μ on X and iii) a measure μx on CO*(x) such that for every Baire set E of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp} , the following hold on setting Ex=ECO*(x)~:

 \item[(1)] xμx(Ex) is measurable. \item[(2)] κ(E)=xμx(Ex)dμx ~. \item[(3)] μz(tEx)=μx(Ex), for all Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle t \in \grp(x,z)}
 and Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle x, z \in \grp}
~.

The presence of a left Haar system on Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} has important topological implications: it requires that the range map Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle r : \grp_{lc} \rightarrow \grp_{lc}^0<math> is open. For such a } \grp_{lc}</math> with a left Haar system, the [[../NormInducedByInnerProduct/|vector space]] Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C_c(\grp_{lc})} is a convolution *--algebra , where for Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle f, g \in C_c(\grp_{lc})} :

f*g(x)=f(t)g(t1x)dλr(x)(t),

with f*(x)=f(x1).

One has Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C^*(\grp_{lc})} to be the enveloping C*--algebra of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C_c(\grp_{lc})} (and also representations are required to be continuous in the inductive limit topology). Equivalently, it is the completion of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \pi_{univ}(C_c(\grp_{lc}))} where πuniv is the universal representation of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} . For example, if Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc} = R_n} , then Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C^*(\grp_{lc})} is just the finite dimensional algebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C_c(\grp_{lc}) = M_n} , the span of the eij 's.

There exists a measurable [[../HilbertBundle/|Hilbert bundle]] Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle (\grp_{lc}^0, \mathbb{H}, \mu)} with Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \mathbb{H} = \left\{ \mathbb{H}^u_{u \in \grp_{lc}^0} \right\}<math> and a G-representation L on } \H</math>. Then, for every pair ξ,η of [[../PiecewiseLinear/|square]] integrable sections of , it is required that the [[../Bijective/|function]] x(L(x)ξ(s(x)),η(r(x)))<math>be\numeasurable.Therepresentation\Phi</math> of Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle C_c(\grp_{lc})} is then given by:\\ Φ(f)ξ|,η=f(x)(L(x)ξ(s(x)),η(r(x)))dν0(x).

The triple (μ,,L) is called a \textit{measurable Failed to parse (unknown function "\grp"): {\displaystyle \grp_{lc}} --Hilbert bundle}.

All Sources

[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29]

References

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AS2k3
  2. E. M. Alfsen and F. W. Schultz: \emph{Geometry of State Spaces of Operator Algebras}, Birkhauser, Boston--Basel--Berlin (2003).
  3. I. Baianu : Categories, Functors and Automata Theory: A Novel Approach to Quantum Automata through Algebraic--Topological Quantum Computations., Proceed. 4th Intl. Congress LMPS , (August-Sept. 1971).
  4. I.C. Baianu, N. Boden and D. Lightowlers.1981. NMR Spin--Echo Responses of Dipolar--Coupled Spin--1/2 Triads in Solids., J. Magnetic Resonance , 43 :101--111.
  5. I. C. Baianu, J. F. Glazebrook and R. Brown.: A Non--Abelian, Categorical Ontology of Spacetimes and Quantum Gravity., Axiomathes 17 ,(3-4): 353-408(2007).
  6. F.A. Bais, B. J. Schroers and J. K. Slingerland: Broken quantum symmetry and confinement phases in planar physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 No. 18 (1--4): 181-201 (2002).
  7. J.W. Barrett.: Geometrical measurements in three-dimensional quantum gravity. Proceedings of the Tenth Oporto Meeting on Geometry, Topology and Physics (2001). Intl. J. Modern Phys. A 18 , October, suppl., 97-113 (2003)
  8. M. Chaician and A. Demichev: Introduction to Quantum Groups , World Scientific (1996).
  9. Coleman and De Luccia: Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay., Phys. Rev. D 21 : 3305 (1980).
  10. A. Connes: Noncommutative Geometry , Academic Press 1994.
  11. L. Crane and I.B. Frenkel. Four-dimensional topological quantum field theory, Hopf categories, and the canonical bases. Topology and physics. J. Math. Phys . 35 (no. 10): 5136-5154 (1994).
  12. W. Drechsler and P. A. Tuckey: On quantum and parallel transport in a Hilbert bundle over spacetime., Classical and Quantum Gravity, 13 :611--632 (1996). doi: 10.1088/0264--9381/13/4/004
  13. V. G. Drinfel'd: Quantum groups, In \emph{Proc. Int. Cong. of Mathematicians, Berkeley 1986}, (ed. A. Gleason), Berkeley, 798--820 (1987).
  14. G. J. Ellis: Higher dimensional crossed modules of algebras, J. of Pure Appl. Algebra 52 (1988), 277--282.
  15. P.. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko, Solutions of the Quantum Dynamical Yang-Baxter Equation and Dynamical Quantum Groups, Comm.Math.Phys., 196: 591-640 (1998)
  16. P. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko: Exchange dynamical quantum groups, Commun. Math. Phys. 205 (1): 19--52 (1999)
  17. P. I. Etingof and O. Schiffmann: Lectures on the dynamical Yang--Baxter equations, in Quantum Groups and Lie Theory (Durham, 1999) , pp. 89--129, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
  18. B. Fauser: A treatise on quantum Clifford Algebras. Konstanz, Habilitationsschrift. arXiv.math.QA/0202059 (2002).
  19. B. Fauser: Grade Free product Formulae from Grassman--Hopf Gebras. Ch. 18 in R. Ablamowicz, Ed., Clifford Algebras: Applications to Mathematics, Physics and Engineering , Birkh\"{a}user: Boston, Basel and Berlin, (2004).
  20. J. M. G. Fell. 1960. "The Dual Spaces of C*--Algebras.", {\em Transactions of the American Mathematical Society}, 94 : 365--403 (1960).
  21. F.M. Fernandez and E. A. Castro.: (Lie) Algebraic Methods in Quantum Chemistry and Physics. , Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc (1996).
  22. R. P. Feynman: Space--Time Approach to Non--Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, {\em Reviews of Modern Physics}, 20: 367-387 (1948). [It is also reprinted in (Schwinger 1958).]
  23. A.~Fr{\"o}hlich, Non-Abelian Homological Algebra. {I . {D}erived functors and satellites.\/}, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 11: 239--252 (1961).
  24. Gel'fand, I. and Naimark, M., 1943, On the Imbedding of Normed Rings into the Ring of Operators in Hilbert Space, Recueil Math\'ematique [Matematicheskii Sbornik] Nouvelle S\'erie , 12 [54]: 197-213. [Reprinted in C*-algebras: 1943--1993, in the series Contemporary Mathematics, 167, Providence, R.I. : American Mathematical Society, 1994.]
  25. R. Gilmore: "Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and Some of Their Applications." , Dover Publs., Inc.: Mineola and New York, 2005.
  26. P. Hahn: Haar measure for measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc . 242 : 1--33(1978).
  27. P. Hahn: The regular representations of measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc . 242 :34--72(1978).
  28. R. Heynman and S. Lifschitz. 1958. Lie Groups and Lie Algebras ., New York and London: Nelson Press.
  29. C. Heunen, N. P. Landsman, B. Spitters.: A topos for algebraic quantum theory, (2008) arXiv:0709.4364v2[quantph]

Template:CourseCat