Complex Analysis/Goursat's Lemma

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Introduction

Goursat's Lemma is a crucial result in the proof of the Cauchy's integral theorem.It restricts the integration paths to triangles, making it provable via a geometric subdivision argument.

Statement

Let D be a closed triangle, GD an open set, and f:U a holomorphic function. Then: Df(z),dz=0.

Proof

Set Δ0:=D. We inductively construct a sequence (Δn)n0 with the properties:

1. ΔnΔn1

2. (Δn)=2n(D), where represents the length of a curve

3. |Df(z),dz|4n|Δnf(z),dz|

For n0 and Δn already constructed, we subdivide Δn by connecting the midpoints of its sides, forming four subtriangles Δn+1i, 1i4. Since the contributions of the midpoints cancel out in the integration, we have:

|Δnf(z)dz|=|i=14Δn+1if(z)dz|i=14|Δn+1if(z)dz|maxi|Δn+1if(z)dz|

Choose 1i4 such that |Δn+1if(z),dz|=maxi|Δn+1if(z),dz| and set Δn+1:=Δn+1i. Then, by construction: Δn+1Δn, (Δn+1)=12(Δn)=2(n+1)(D), and |Df(z),dz|4n|Δnf(z),dz|4n+1|Δn+1f(z),dz|.

This ensures Δn+1 has the required properties.

Since all Δn are compact, n0Δn. Let z0n0Δn. As f is holomorphic at z0, there exists a neighborhood V of z0 and a continuous function A:V with A(z0)=0 such that: f(z)=f(z0)+(zz0)f(z0)+A(z)(zz0),zV.

Since the function zf(z0)+(zz0)f(z0) has a primitive, it follows for n0 with ΔnV that: Δnf(z),dz=Δnf(z0)+(zz0)f(z0)+A(z)(zz0),dz=ΔnA(z)(zz0),dz.

Thus, due to the continuity of A and A(z0)=0, we obtain:

|Df(z)dz|4n|Δnf(z)dz|=4n|ΔnA(z)(zz0)dz|4n(Δn)maxzΔn|zz0||A(z)|4n(Δn)2maxzΔn|A(z)|=(D)maxzΔn|A(z)|(D)|A(z0)|=0,n.

Notation in the Proof

Δn is the n-th subtriangle of the original triangle, with side lengths scaled by a factor of 12n.

Δn is the integration path along the boundary of the n-th subtriangle, with perimeter (Δn)=12n(Δ0).


See Also


Page Information

You can display this page as Wiki2Reveal slides

Wiki2Reveal

The Wiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.