PlanetPhysics/Weak Hopf Algebra
\newcommand{\sqdiagram}[9]{Failed to parse (unknown function "\diagram"): {\displaystyle \diagram #1 \rto^{#2} \dto_{#4}& \eqno{\mbox{#9}}} }
Definition 0.1 :
In order to define a weak Hopf algebra , one `weakens' or relaxes certain axioms of a [[../QuantumOperatorAlgebra5/|Hopf algebra]] as follows~:
- [(1)] The comultiplication is not necessarily unit--preserving.
- [(2)] The counit Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle \vep} is not necessarily a [[../TrivialGroupoid/|homomorphism]] of algebras.
- [(3)] The axioms for the antipode map Failed to parse (unknown function "\lra"): {\displaystyle S : A \lra A} with respect to the counit are as follows. For all , Failed to parse (unknown function "\ID"): {\displaystyle m(\ID \otimes S) \Delta (h) &= (\vep \otimes \ID)(\Delta (1) (h \otimes 1)) \\ m(S \otimes \ID) \Delta (h) &= (\ID \otimes \vep)((1 \otimes h) \Delta(1)) \\ S(h) &= S(h_{(1)}) h_{(2)} S(h_{(3)}) ~. }
These axioms may be appended by the following [[../Commutativity/|commutative diagrams]] Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{CD}"): {\displaystyle {\begin{CD} A \otimes A @> S\otimes \ID >> A \otimes A \\ @A \Delta AA @VV m V \\ A @ > u \circ \vep >> A \end{CD}} \qquad {\begin{CD} A \otimes A @> \ID\otimes S >> A \otimes A \\ @A \Delta AA @VV m V \\ A @ > u \circ \vep >> A \end{CD}} } along with the counit axiom: Failed to parse (unknown function "\xymatrix"): {\displaystyle \xymatrix@C=3pc@R=3pc{ A \otimes A \ar[d]_{\vep \otimes 1} & A \ar[l]_{\Delta} \ar[dl]_{\ID_A} \ar[d]^{\Delta} \\ A & A \otimes A \ar[l]^{1 \otimes \vep}} } Some authors substitute the term quantum Template:'groupoidTemplate:' for a weak Hopf algebra.
Examples of weak Hopf algebras.
- [(1)] We refer here to Bais et al. (2002). Let be a [[../AbelianCategory3/|non-Abelian]] [[../TrivialGroupoid/|group]] and a discrete subgroup. Let denote the space of [[../Bijective/|functions]] on and Failed to parse (unknown function "\bC"): {\displaystyle \bC H} the group algebra (which consists of the linear span of group elements with the group structure). The quantum double (Drinfeld, 1987) is defined by Failed to parse (unknown function "\wti"): {\displaystyle D(H) = F(H)~ \wti{\otimes}~ \bC H~, } where, for , the `twisted [[../Tensor/|tensor]] product' is specified by Failed to parse (unknown function "\wti"): {\displaystyle \wti{\otimes} \mapsto ~(f_1 \otimes h_1) (f_2 \otimes h_2)(x) = f_1(x) f_2(h_1 x h_1^{-1}) \otimes h_1 h_2 ~. } The physical interpretation is often to take as the `electric [[../BoseEinsteinStatistics/|gauge group]]' and as the `magnetic symmetry' generated by ~. In terms of the counit Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle \vep} , the double has a trivial [[../CategoricalGroupRepresentation/|representation]] given by Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle \vep(f \otimes h) = f(e)} ~. We next look at certain features of this construction. For the purpose of braiding [[../Bijective/|relations]] there is an [[../Matrix/|matrix]], Failed to parse (unknown function "\a"): {\displaystyle R \in D(H) \otimes D(H)<math>, leading to the [[../QuantumSpinNetworkFunctor2/|operator]] <math> \mathcal R \equiv \sigma \cdot (\Pi^A_{\a} \otimes \Pi^B_{\be}) (R)~, } in terms of the Clebsch--Gordan series Failed to parse (unknown function "\a"): {\displaystyle \Pi^A_{\a} \otimes \Pi^B_{\be} \cong N^{AB \gamma}_{\a \be C}~ \Pi^C_{\gamma}} , and where denotes a flip operator. The operator is sometimes called the monodromy or Aharanov--Bohm [[../PureState/|phase factor]]. In the case of a condensate in a state in the carrier space of some representation Failed to parse (unknown function "\a"): {\displaystyle \Pi^A_{\a}} ~. One considers the maximal Hopf subalgebra of a Hopf algebra for which is --invariant; specifically ~: Failed to parse (unknown function "\a"): {\displaystyle \Pi^A_{\a} (P)~\vert v \rangle = \vep(P) \vert v \rangle~,~ \forall P \in T~. } \item[(2)] For the second example, consider ~. The algebra of functions on can be broken to the algebra of functions on , that is, to , where is normal in , that is, ~. Next, consider ~. On breaking a purely electric condensate , the magnetic symmetry remains unbroken, but the electric symmetry Failed to parse (unknown function "\bC"): {\displaystyle \bC H} is broken to Failed to parse (unknown function "\bC"): {\displaystyle \bC N_v} , with , the stabilizer of T = F(H) \wti{\otimes} \bC N_v</math>~. \item[(3)] In Nikshych and Vainerman (2000) quantum groupoids (as weak C*--Hopf algebras, see below) were studied in relationship to the [[../AbelianCategory3/|noncommutative]] symmetries of depth 2 von Neumann subfactors. If is the Jones extension induced by a finite index depth inclusion of factors, then admits a quantum groupoid structure and acts on , so that B_2 = B_1 \rtimes Q</math>~. Similarly, in Rehren (1997) `[[../Paragroups/|paragroups]]' (derived from weak C*--Hopf algebras) comprise (quantum) [[../GroupoidHomomorphism2/|groupoids]] of equivalence classes such as associated with 6j--symmetry groups (relative to a fusion rules algebra). They correspond to [[../Bijective/|type]] [[../CoordinateSpace/|von Neumann algebras]] in [[../QuantumParadox/|quantum mechanics]], and arise as symmetries where the local subfactors (in the sense of containment of [[../QuantumSpinNetworkFunctor2/|observables]] within [[../CosmologicalConstant/|fields]]) have depth 2 in the Jones extension. Related is how a von Neumann algebra , such as of finite index depth 2, sits inside a weak Hopf algebra formed as the crossed product (B\"ohm et al. 1999). \item[(4)] In Mack and Schomerus (1992) using a more general notion of the Drinfeld construction, develop the notion of a \emph{quasi triangular quasi--Hopf algebra} (QTQHA) is developed with the aim of studying a range of essential symmetries with special properties, such the [[../QuantumGroup4/|quantum group]] algebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\U"): {\displaystyle \U_q (\rm{sl}_2)} with ~. If , then it is shown that a QTQHA is canonically associated with Failed to parse (unknown function "\U"): {\displaystyle \U_q (\rm{sl}_2)} . Such QTQHAs are claimed as the true symmetries of minimal conformal field theories.
Definitions of Related Concepts
Let us recall two basic [[../PreciseIdea/|concepts]] of [[../QuantumOperatorAlgebra5/|quantum operator algebra]] that are essential to [[../CoIntersections/|algebraic]] [[../SpaceTimeQuantizationInQuantumGravityTheories/|quantum theories]]. \\
\subsection {Definition of a Von Neumann Algebra.}
Let denote a complex (separable) [[../NormInducedByInnerProduct/|Hilbert space]]. A \emph{von Neumann algebra} Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} acting on is a subset of the algebra of all bounded [[../QuantumOperatorAlgebra4/|operators]] Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} such that:
\item[(1)] Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A}
is closed under the adjoint [[../Cod/|operation]] (with the adjoint of an element denoted by ). \item[(2)] Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A}
equals its [[../CoordinateSpace/|bicommutant]], namely: Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A= \{A \in \cL(\mathbb{H}) : \forall B \in \cL(\mathbb{H}), \forall C\in \A,~ (BC=CB)\Rightarrow (AB=BA)\}~. }
If one calls a [[../CoordinateSpace/|commutant]] of a set Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} the special set of bounded operators on Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} which [[../Commutator/|commute]] with all elements in Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} , then this second condition implies that the commutant of the commutant of Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is again the set Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} .
On the other hand, a von Neumann algebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} inherits a unital subalgebra from Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} , and according to the first condition in its definition Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} does indeed inherit a *-subalgebra structure, as further explained in the next [[../IsomorphicObjectsUnderAnIsomorphism/|section]] on [[../VonNeumannAlgebra2/|C*-algebras]]. Furthermore, we have notable Bicommutant [[../Formula/|theorem]] which states that Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} \emph{is a von Neumann algebra if and only if Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is a *-subalgebra of Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} , closed for the smallest topology defined by continuous maps for all where denotes the [[../NormInducedByInnerProduct/|inner product]] defined on }~. For further instruction on this subject, see e.g. Aflsen and Schultz (2003), Connes (1994).
Definition of a Hopf algebra
Firstly, a unital associative algebra consists of a linear space together with two linear maps
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle m &: A \otimes A \lra A~,~(multiplication) \eta &: \bC \lra A~,~ (unity) } satisfying the conditions Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle m(m \otimes \mathbf 1) &= m (\mathbf 1 \otimes m) \\ m(\mathbf 1 \otimes \eta) &= m (\eta \otimes \mathbf 1) = \ID~. } This first condition can be seen in terms of a commuting [[../TrivialGroupoid/|diagram]]~: Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{CD}"): {\displaystyle \begin{CD} A \otimes A \otimes A @> m \otimes \ID>> A \otimes A \\ @V \ID \otimes mVV @VV m V \\ A \otimes A @ > m >> A \end{CD} } Next suppose we consider `reversing the arrows', and take an algebra equipped with a linear homorphisms Failed to parse (unknown function "\lra"): {\displaystyle \Delta : A \lra A \otimes A<math>, satisfying, for } a,b \in A</math> :
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \Delta(ab) &= \Delta(a) \Delta(b) \\ (\Delta \otimes \ID) \Delta &= (\ID \otimes \Delta) \Delta~. } We call a comultiplication , which is said to be coasociative in so far that the following diagram commutes Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{CD}"): {\displaystyle \begin{CD} A \otimes A \otimes A @< \Delta\otimes \ID<< A \otimes A \\ @A \ID \otimes \Delta AA @AA \Delta A \\ A \otimes A @ < \Delta << A \end{CD} } There is also a counterpart to , the counity map Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle \vep : A \lra \bC} satisfying Failed to parse (unknown function "\ID"): {\displaystyle (\ID \otimes \vep) \circ \Delta = (\vep \otimes \ID) \circ \Delta = \ID~. } A [[../QuantumOperatorAlgebra5/|bialgebra]] Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle (A, m, \Delta, \eta, \vep)<math> is a linear space } Am, \Delta, \eta, \vep</math> satisfying the above properties.
Now to recover anything resembling a group structure, we must append such a bialgebra with an [[../QuantumOperatorAlgebra5/|antihomomorphism]] Failed to parse (unknown function "\lra"): {\displaystyle S : A \lra A} , satisfying , for ~. This map is defined implicitly via the property~: Failed to parse (unknown function "\ID"): {\displaystyle m(S \otimes \ID) \circ \Delta = m(\ID \otimes S) \circ \Delta = \eta \circ \vep~~. } We call the antipode map . A Hopf algebra is then a bialgebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle (A,m, \eta, \Delta, \vep)} equipped with an antipode map ~.
Commutative and noncommutative Hopf algebras form the backbone of quantum `groups' and are essential to the generalizations of symmetry. Indeed, in most respects a quantum `group' is identifiable with a Hopf algebra. When such algebras are actually associated with proper groups of matrices there is considerable scope for their representations on both finite and infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces.
All Sources
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]
References
- ↑ E. M. Alfsen and F. W. Schultz: Geometry of State Spaces of Operator Algebras , Birkhäuser, Boston--Basel--Berlin (2003).
- ↑ I. Baianu : Categories, Functors and Automata Theory: A Novel Approach to Quantum Automata through Algebraic--Topological Quantum Computations., Proceed. 4th Intl. Congress LMPS , (August-Sept. 1971).
- ↑ I. C. Baianu, J. F. Glazebrook and R. Brown.: A Non--Abelian, Categorical Ontology of Spacetimes and Quantum Gravity., Axiomathes 17 ,(3-4): 353-408(2007).
- ↑ I.C.Baianu, R. Brown J.F. Glazebrook, and G. Georgescu, Towards Quantum Non--Abelian Algebraic Topology. in preparation , (2008).
- ↑ F.A. Bais, B. J. Schroers and J. K. Slingerland: Broken quantum symmetry and confinement phases in planar physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 No. 18 (1--4): 181--201 (2002).
- ↑ J.W. Barrett.: Geometrical measurements in three-dimensional quantum gravity. Proceedings of the Tenth Oporto Meeting on Geometry, Topology and Physics (2001). Intl. J. Modern Phys. A 18 , October, suppl., 97--113 (2003).
- ↑ M. R. Buneci.: Groupoid Representations , (orig. title "Reprezentari de Grupoizi"), Ed. Mirton: Timishoara (2003).
- ↑ M. Chaician and A. Demichev: Introduction to Quantum Groups , World Scientific (1996).
- ↑ Coleman and De Luccia: Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay., Phys. Rev. D 21 : 3305 (1980).
- ↑ L. Crane and I.B. Frenkel. Four-dimensional topological quantum field theory, Hopf categories, and the canonical bases. Topology and physics. J. Math. Phys . 35 (no. 10): 5136--5154 (1994).
- ↑ W. Drechsler and P. A. Tuckey: On quantum and parallel transport in a Hilbert bundle over spacetime., Classical and Quantum Gravity , 13 :611-632 (1996). doi: 10.1088/0264--9381/13/4/004
- ↑ V. G. Drinfel'd: Quantum groups, In Proc. Intl. Congress of Mathematicians, Berkeley 1986, (ed. A. Gleason), Berkeley, 798-820 (1987).
- ↑ G. J. Ellis: Higher dimensional crossed modules of algebras, J. of Pure Appl. Algebra 52 (1988), 277-282.
- ↑ P.. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko, Solutions of the Quantum Dynamical Yang-Baxter Equation and Dynamical Quantum Groups, Comm.Math.Phys. , 196 : 591-640 (1998).
- ↑ P. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko: Exchange dynamical quantum groups, Commun. Math. Phys. 205 (1): 19-52 (1999)
- ↑ P. I. Etingof and O. Schiffmann: Lectures on the dynamical Yang--Baxter equations, in Quantum Groups and Lie Theory (Durham, 1999) , pp. 89-129, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
- ↑ B. Fauser: A treatise on quantum Clifford Algebras . Konstanz, Habilitationsschrift. arXiv.math.QA/0202059 (2002).
- ↑ B. Fauser: Grade Free product Formulae from Grassman--Hopf Gebras. Ch. 18 in R. Ablamowicz, Ed., Clifford Algebras: Applications to Mathematics, Physics and Engineering , Birkhäuser: Boston, Basel and Berlin, (2004).
- ↑ J. M. G. Fell.: The Dual Spaces of C*--Algebras., Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 94 : 365--403 (1960).
- ↑ F.M. Fernandez and E. A. Castro.: (Lie) Algebraic Methods in Quantum Chemistry and Physics. , Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc (1996).
- ↑ R. P. Feynman: Space--Time Approach to Non--Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, {\em Reviews of Modern Physics}, 20: 367--387 (1948). [It is also reprinted in (Schwinger 1958).]
- ↑ A.~Fröhlich: Non--Abelian Homological Algebra. {I}. {D}erived functors and satellites., Proc. London Math. Soc. , 11 (3): 239--252 (1961).
- ↑ R. Gilmore: Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and Some of Their Applications. , Dover Publs., Inc.: Mineola and New York, 2005.
- ↑ P. Hahn: Haar measure for measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc . 242 : 1--33(1978).
- ↑ P. Hahn: The regular representations of measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc . 242 :34--72(1978).
- ↑ R. Heynman and S. Lifschitz. 1958. Lie Groups and Lie Algebras ., New York and London: Nelson Press.
- ↑ C. Heunen, N. P. Landsman, B. Spitters.: A topos for algebraic quantum theory, (2008) arXiv:0709.4364v2 [quant--ph]