PlanetPhysics/Weak Hopf C Algebra 2

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

\newcommand{\sqdiagram}[9]{Failed to parse (unknown function "\diagram"): {\displaystyle \diagram #1 \rto^{#2} \dto_{#4}& \eqno{\mbox{#9}}} }

 A weak Hopf C*-algebra  is defined as a weak Hopf algebra which admits a

faithful *--representation on a [[../NormInducedByInnerProduct/|Hilbert space]]. The weak C*--Hopf algebra is therefore much more likely to be closely related to a `[[../WeakHopfAlgebra/|quantum groupoid]]' than the weak Hopf algebra. However, one can argue that [[../LocallyCompactGroupoid/|locally compact groupoids]] equipped with a [[../HigherDimensionalQuantumAlgebroid/|Haar measure]] are even closer to defining quantum groupoids. There are already several, significant examples that motivate the consideration of weak C*-Hopf algebras which also deserve mentioning in the context of `standard' [[../QuantumOperatorAlgebra5/|quantum theories]]. Furthermore, notions such as (proper) weak C*-algebroids can provide the main framework for symmetry breaking and [[../LQG2/|quantum gravity]] that we are considering here. Thus, one may consider the quasi-group symmetries constructed by means of special transformations of the "coordinate space" M.

Remark : Recall that the weak Hopf algebra is defined as the extension of a [[../QuantumOperatorAlgebra5/|Hopf algebra]] by weakening the definining axioms of a Hopf algebra as follows~:

\item[(1)] The comultiplication is not necessarily unit-preserving. \item[(2)] The counit Failed to parse (unknown function "\vep"): {\displaystyle \vep} is not necessarily a [[../TrivialGroupoid/|homomorphism]] of algebras. \item[(3)] The axioms for the antipode map Failed to parse (unknown function "\lra"): {\displaystyle S : A \lra A} with respect to the counit are as follows. For all

hH

,

Failed to parse (unknown function "\ID"): {\displaystyle m(\ID \otimes S) \Delta (h) &= (\vep \otimes \ID)(\Delta (1) (h \otimes 1)) \\ m(S \otimes \ID) \Delta (h) &= (\ID \otimes \vep)((1 \otimes h) \Delta(1)) \\ S(h) &= S(h_{(1)}) h_{(2)} S(h_{(3)}) ~. }

These axioms may be appended by the following [[../Commutativity/|commutative diagrams]]

Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{CD}"): {\displaystyle {\begin{CD} A \otimes A @> S\otimes \ID >> A \otimes A \\ @A \Delta AA @VV m V \\ A @ > u \circ \vep >> A \end{CD}} \qquad {\begin{CD} A \otimes A @> \ID\otimes S >> A \otimes A \\ @A \Delta AA @VV m V \\ A @ > u \circ \vep >> A \end{CD}} }

along with the counit axiom:

Failed to parse (unknown function "\xymatrix"): {\displaystyle \xymatrix@C=3pc@R=3pc{ A \otimes A \ar[d]_{\vep \otimes 1} & A \ar[l]_{\Delta} \ar[dl]_{\ID_A} \ar[d]^{\Delta} \\ A & A \otimes A \ar[l]^{1 \otimes \vep}} }

Some authors substitute the term quantum `groupoid' for a weak Hopf algebra.

Examples of weak Hopf C*-algebra.

\item[(1)] In Nikshych and Vainerman (2000) quantum groupoids were considered as weak C*--Hopf algebras and were studied in relationship to the [[../AbelianCategory3/|noncommutative]] symmetries of depth 2 von Neumann subfactors. If

ABB1B2

is the Jones extension induced by a finite index depth

2

inclusion

AB

of

II1

factors, then

Q=AB2

admits a quantum groupoid structure and acts on

B1

, so that </math>B = B_1^{Q}

and

B_2 = B_1 \rtimes QFailed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle ~. Similarly, in Rehren (1997) `[[../Paragroups/|paragroups]]' (derived from weak C*--Hopf algebras) comprise (quantum) [[../QuantumOperatorAlgebra5/|groupoids]] of equivalence classes such as associated with 6j--symmetry [[../TrivialGroupoid/|groups]] (relative to a fusion rules algebra). They correspond to [[../Bijective/|type]] <math>II} von Neumann algebras in [[../QuantumParadox/|quantum mechanics]], and arise as symmetries where the local subfactors (in the sense of containment of [[../QuantumSpinNetworkFunctor2/|observables]] within [[../CosmologicalConstant/|fields]]) have depth

2

in the Jones extension. Related is how a von Neumann algebra

N

, such as of finite index depth

2

, sits inside a weak Hopf algebra formed as the crossed product

NA

(B\"ohm et al. 1999). \item[(2)] In Mack and Schomerus (1992) using a more general notion of the Drinfeld construction, develop the notion of a \emph{quasi triangular quasi--Hopf algebra} (QTQHA) is developed with the aim of studying a range of essential symmetries with special properties, such the [[../QuantumGroup4/|quantum group]] algebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\U"): {\displaystyle \U_q (\rm{sl}_2)} with

|q|=1

~. If

qp=1

, then it is shown that a QTQHA is canonically associated with Failed to parse (unknown function "\U"): {\displaystyle \U_q (\rm{sl}_2)} . Such QTQHAs are claimed as the true symmetries of minimal conformal field theories.

\subsection {Von Neumann Algebras (or W*-algebras).}

Let denote a complex (separable) Hilbert space. A \emph{von Neumann algebra} Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} acting on is a subset of the *--algebra of all bounded [[../QuantumOperatorAlgebra4/|operators]] Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} such that:

\item[(1)] Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is closed under the adjoint [[../Cod/|operation]] (with the adjoint of an element

T

denoted by

T*

). \item[(2)] Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} equals its bicommutant, namely:

Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A= \{A \in \cL(\mathbb{H}) : \forall B \in \cL(\mathbb{H}), \forall C\in \A,~ (BC=CB)\Rightarrow (AB=BA)\}~. }

If one calls a commutant of a set Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} the special set of bounded operators on Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} which [[../Commutator/|commute]] with all elements in Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} , then this second condition implies that the commutant of the commutant of Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is again the set Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} .

On the other hand, a von Neumann algebra Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} inherits a unital subalgebra from Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} , and according to the first condition in its definition Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} does indeed inherit a *-subalgebra structure, as further explained in the next [[../IsomorphicObjectsUnderAnIsomorphism/|section]] on [[../VonNeumannAlgebra2/|C*-algebras]]. Furthermore, we have the notable Bicommutant [[../Formula/|theorem]] which states that Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} \emph{is a von Neumann algebra if and only if Failed to parse (unknown function "\A"): {\displaystyle \A} is a *-subalgebra of Failed to parse (unknown function "\cL"): {\displaystyle \cL(\mathbb{H})} , closed for the smallest topology defined by continuous maps (ξ,η)(Aξ,η) for all <Aξ,η)> where <.,.> denotes the [[../NormInducedByInnerProduct/|inner product]] defined on }~. For further instruction on this subject, see e.g. Aflsen and Schultz (2003), Connes (1994). \\

Commutative and noncommutative Hopf algebras form the backbone of quantum `groups' and are essential to the generalizations of symmetry. Indeed, in most respects a quantum `group' is identifiable with a Hopf algebra. When such algebras are actually associated with proper groups of [[../Matrix/|matrices]] there is considerable scope for their [[../CategoricalGroupRepresentation/|representations]] on both finite and infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces.

All Sources

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24]

References

  1. E. M. Alfsen and F. W. Schultz: Geometry of State Spaces of Operator Algebras , Birkh\"auser, Boston--Basel--Berlin (2003).
  2. I. Baianu : Categories, Functors and Automata Theory: A Novel Approach to Quantum Automata through Algebraic--Topological Quantum Computations., Proceed. 4th Intl. Congress LMPS , (August-Sept. 1971).
  3. I. C. Baianu, J. F. Glazebrook and R. Brown.: A Non--Abelian, Categorical Ontology of Spacetimes and Quantum Gravity., Axiomathes 17 ,(3-4): 353-408(2007).
  4. I.C.Baianu, R. Brown J.F. Glazebrook, and G. Georgescu, Towards Quantum Non--Abelian Algebraic Topology. in preparation , (2008).
  5. F.A. Bais, B. J. Schroers and J. K. Slingerland: Broken quantum symmetry and confinement phases in planar physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 No. 18 (1--4): 181--201 (2002).
  6. M. R. Buneci.: Groupoid Representations , Ed. Mirton: Timishoara (2003).
  7. M. Chaician and A. Demichev: Introduction to Quantum Groups , World Scientific (1996).
  8. L. Crane and I.B. Frenkel. Four-dimensional topological quantum field theory, Hopf categories, and the canonical bases. Topology and physics. J. Math. Phys . 35 (no. 10): 5136--5154 (1994).
  9. V. G. Drinfel'd: Quantum groups, In \emph{Proc. Intl. Congress of Mathematicians, Berkeley 1986}, (ed. A. Gleason), Berkeley, 798-820 (1987).
  10. G. J. Ellis: Higher dimensional crossed modules of algebras, J. of Pure Appl. Algebra 52 (1988), 277-282.
  11. P.. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko, Solutions of the Quantum Dynamical Yang-Baxter Equation and Dynamical Quantum Groups, Comm.Math.Phys. , 196 : 591-640 (1998).
  12. P. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko: Exchange dynamical quantum groups, Commun. Math. Phys. 205 (1): 19-52 (1999)
  13. P. I. Etingof and O. Schiffmann: Lectures on the dynamical Yang--Baxter equations, in Quantum Groups and Lie Theory (Durham, 1999) , pp. 89-129, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
  14. B. Fauser: A treatise on quantum Clifford Algebras . Konstanz, Habilitationsschrift. \\ arXiv.math.QA/0202059 (2002).
  15. B. Fauser: Grade Free product Formulae from Grassman--Hopf Gebras. Ch. 18 in R. Ablamowicz, Ed., Clifford Algebras: Applications to Mathematics, Physics and Engineering , Birkh\"{a}user: Boston, Basel and Berlin, (2004).
  16. J. M. G. Fell.: The Dual Spaces of C*--Algebras., \emph{Transactions of the American Mathematical Society}, 94 : 365--403 (1960).
  17. F.M. Fernandez and E. A. Castro.: (Lie) Algebraic Methods in Quantum Chemistry and Physics. , Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc (1996).
  18. R. P. Feynman: Space--Time Approach to Non--Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, {\em Reviews of Modern Physics}, 20: 367--387 (1948). [It is also reprinted in (Schwinger 1958).]
  19. A.~Fr{\"o}hlich: Non--Abelian Homological Algebra. {I}. {D}erived functors and satellites.\/, Proc. London Math. Soc. , 11 (3): 239--252 (1961).
  20. R. Gilmore: Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and Some of Their Applications. , Dover Publs., Inc.: Mineola and New York, 2005.
  21. P. Hahn: Haar measure for measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc . 242 : 1--33(1978).
  22. P. Hahn: The regular representations of measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc . 242 :34--72(1978).
  23. R. Heynman and S. Lifschitz. 1958. Lie Groups and Lie Algebras ., New York and London: Nelson Press.
  24. Leonid Vainerman. 2003. Locally Compact Quantum Groups and Groupoids: Proceedings of the Meeting of Theoretical Physicists and Mathematicians ., Strasbourg, February 21-23, 2002., Walter de Gruyter Gmbh \& Co: Berlin.

Template:CourseCat