University of Florida/Egm6341/s10.Team2/HW1

Problem 1

Problem Statement

Find $\underset{x\to 0}{\lim }\frac{e^x-1}{x}$ and plot graph of the function for $x\in [0,1]$

Solution

This limit cannot be performed directly since it yields $\frac{0}{0}$ form. So, the L'Hôpitals Rule technique must be used:

L'Hôpitals Rule States:

$\underset{x\to c}{\lim }\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=\underset{x\to c}{\lim }\frac{f^{\prime }(x)}{g^{\prime }(x)}$

as long as f and g are functions that are differentiable on an open interval (a,b) which contains c, except at c itself.

Applying this technique the following is found:

$f(x)=e^x-1f^{\prime }(x)=e^x$

$g(x)=x{g}^{\prime }(x)=1$

$\underset{x\to 0}{\lim }\frac{e^x-1}{x}=\underset{x\to 0}{\lim }\frac{e^x}{1}=e^0=1$

Graph of $x$ (on X-axis) versus $\frac{e^x-1}{x}$ (on Y-axis)

File:Egm6341.s10.Team2.hw1Problem1.jpg

MATLAB Code:

To generate the graph for $x$ vs $\frac{e^x-1}{x}$

for i=1:1000
x=((i-1)/1000);
y=(exp(x)-1)/x;
plot(x,y);
hold on;
end

Solution for problem 1: Guillermo Varela 19:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC) and Srikanth Madala 19:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Proofread problem 1: Guillermo Varela 19:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC) and Srikanth Madala 19:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Problem 2

Problem Statement

Pg. 2-3, Find $P_n(x)$ and $R_{n+1}(x)$ of $e^x$

Solution

The Taylor's series expansion for any function f(x) can be expressed as follows:

$f(x)=P_n(x)+R_{n+1}(x)$ where

$P_n(x)=f(x_0)+\frac{(x-x_0)}{1!}{f}^{\prime }(x_0)+.....+\frac{(x-x_0{)}^n}{n!}{f}^n(x_0)$

$R_{n+1}(x)=\frac{1}{n!}\underset{x_0}{\overset{x}{\int }}(x-t{)}^n{f}^{n+1}(t)dt$

If f(x) is considered to be $e^x$, then by using the above expansion, $P_n(x)$ becomes:

$P_n(x)=e^{x_0}+\frac{(x-x_0)}{1!}{e}^{x_0}+\frac{(x-x_0{)}^2}{2!}{e}^{x_0}+.....+\frac{(x-x_0{)}^n}{n!}{e}^{x_0}$

Let $x_0=0$, then:

$\begin{array}{ccc}{P}_n(x)& =& e^0+\frac{x}{1!}{e}^0+\frac{x^2}{2!}{e}^0+.....+\frac{x^n}{n!}{e}^0\\ \\ & =& 1+\frac{x}{1!}+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...........+\frac{x^n}{n!}\end{array}$

Similarly, $R_{n+1}(x)$ becomes:

$R_{n+1}(x)=\frac{1}{n!}\underset{t=x_0=0}{\overset{t=x}{\int }}(x-t{)}^n{e}^{t}dt$

Using Integral mean value theorem (IMVT):

$\begin{array}{ccc}{R}_{n+1}(x)& =& \frac{e^{{\xi }_x}}{n!}\underset{0}{\overset{x}{\int }}(x-t{)}^{n}dt\\ \\ & =& \frac{e^{{\xi }_x}}{n!}\frac{x^{n+1}}{n+1}=\frac{x^{n+1}{e}^{{\xi }_x}}{n+1!}\end{array}$

where ${\xi }_x$ lies in $[0,x]$

Solution for problem 2: Srikanth Madala 19:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Proofread problem 2: Egm6341.s10.team2.patodon 04:21, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Problem 3

Problem Statement

Pg. 3-3.

$f(x)=sin(x)g(x)=sin(x-\frac{\pi }{2})=-cos(x)$

Plot f and g

$xϵ[0,\pi ]$

Find Infinity norm of

i)${\Vert f(x)\Vert }_{\mathrm{\infty }}$

ii)${\Vert g(x)\Vert }_{\mathrm{\infty }}$

iii)${\Vert f(x)-g(x)\Vert }_{\mathrm{\infty }}$

Solution

The Infinity norm is defined as follows:

${\Vert f(.)\Vert }_{\mathrm{\infty }}=max|f(x)|$

Using this definition the following is identified:

i) ${\Vert sin(x)\Vert }_{\mathrm{\infty }}=1$

ii) ${\Vert -cos(x)\Vert }_{\mathrm{\infty }}=1$

iii) ${\Vert sin(x)+cos(x)\Vert }_{\mathrm{\infty }}=1.4142$

File:Problem3.jpg

Solution for problem 3: Guillermo Varela

Problem 4

Problem Statement

Pg 5-1.

Prove the Integral Mean Value Theorem (IMVT) p. 2-3 for w(.) non-negative. i.e $w\ge 0$

Solution

We have the IMVT as

$\underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}f(x)w(x)dx=f(\xi )\underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}w(x)dx$

For a given function $f(x)$ Let m be the minimum of the function and M be the maximum of the same function

Then we know that, $m\le f(x)\le M$

multiplying the inequality throughout by $w(x)\ge 0$ and integrating between $[a,b]$ we get:

$\underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}m.w(x)dx\le \underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}f(x).w(x)dx\le \underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}M.w(x)dx$

$m\underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}w(x)dx\le \underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}f(x).w(x)dx\le M\underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}w(x)dx$

writing $\underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}w(x)=I$, we get

$mI\le \underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}f(x)w(x)dx\le MI$

It is seen that when w(x) = 0, the result is valid. Consider the case when w(x) > 0

dividing throughout by $I$

$m\le \frac{1}{I}\underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}f(x)w(x)dx\le M$

From the Intermediate Value Theorem, we know that there exists $\xi \in [a,b]$ such that

$f(\xi )=\frac{1}{I}\underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}f(x)w(x)dx$

i.e

$f(\xi )\underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}w(x)dx=\underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}f(x)w(x)dx$

Hence Proved

Solution for problem 4: --Egm6341.s10.team2.niki 23:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Proofread problem 4:

Problem 5

Problem Statement

Pg. 5-1. Use the integral mean value theorem (IMVT) to show eq. 5 P. 2-2 yields the equation 1 of pg. 2-3.

Solution

File:Egm6341.S10.Team2.Problem5.JPG

Solution for problem 5: Jiang Pengxiang

Proofread problem 5: Srikanth Madala 19:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Problem 6

Problem Statement

Pg. 5-3. Repeat integration by parts to reveal

$\frac{(x-x_0{)}^2}{2!}{f}^{(2)}(x_0)+\frac{(x-x_0{)}^3}{3!}{f}^{(3)}(x_0)$

Plus the remainder.

Next, Assume eq. 4 and 5 of Pg. 2-2 are true, do integration by parts once more.

Solution

From Meeting 5 lecture notes:

$\begin{array}{ccc}f(x)& =& f(x_0)+\underset{x_0}{\overset{x}{\int }}{f}^{(1)}(t)dt\end{array}$

Integration by parts yields:

$\begin{array}{ccc}f(x)& =& f(x_0)+\frac{x-x_0}{1!}{f}^{(1)}(x_0)+\underset{x_0}{\overset{x}{\int }}(x-t)f^{(2)}(t)dt\end{array}$

Performing integration by parts on the integral in the above result:

$\begin{array}{c}\underset{x_0}{\overset{x}{\int }}(x-t)f^{(2)}(t)dt\\ =\underset{x_0}{\overset{x}{\int }}{u}^{\prime }v\\ =[uv{]}_{x_0}^x-\int u{v}^{\prime }\\ =[(tx-\frac{t^2}{2})(f^{(2)})(t){]}_{x_0}^x-\underset{x_0}{\overset{x}{\int }}(tx-\frac{t^2}{2})(t{f}^{(3)}(t))dt\\ =(\frac{x^2}{2})(f^{(2)}(x))-(x_{0}x-\frac{x_0^2}{2})(f^{(2)}(x_0))-\underset{x_0}{\overset{x}{\int }}(tx-\frac{t^2}{2})(t{f}^{(3)}(t))dt\\ =(\frac{x^2}{2})(f^{(2)}(x))+(\frac{x_0^2}{2})(f^{(2)}(x_0))-(x_{0}x)f^{(2)}(x_0)-\underset{x_0}{\overset{x}{\int }}(tx-\frac{t^2}{2})(t{f}^{(3)}(t))dt\\ =\underset{x_0}{\overset{x}{\int }}(\frac{x^2}{2})(f^{(3)}(t))dt+x_{0}x{f}^{(2))}(x_0)\end{array}$

Solution for problem 6: Egm6341.s10.team2.patodon 04:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Proofread problem 6: Guillermo Varela

Problem 7

Problem Statement

Pg. 6-1

$f(x)=sin(x)\mathrm{\forall }xϵ[0,\pi ]$

Construct Taylor Series of f(.) around $x_0\approx \frac{\pi }{4}$ for n=0,1,...,10 and plot for each n.

Solution

The Taylor's series expansion for any function $f(x)$ can be expressed as follows:

$f(x)=P_n(x)+R_{n+1}(x)$ where

$P_n(x)=f(x_0)+\frac{(x-x_0)}{1!}{f}^{\prime }(x_0)+.....+\frac{(x-x_0{)}^n}{n!}{f}^n(x_0)$

$R_{n+1}(x)=\frac{1}{n!}\underset{x_0}{\overset{x}{\int }}(x-t{)}^n{f}^{n+1}(t)dt$

If $f(x)$ is considered to be $\sin x$, $n=10$ and $x_0=\frac{\pi }{4}$, then by using the above expansion, $P_n(x)$ and $R_{n+1}(x)$ becomes:

$P_{10}(x)=\sin \frac{\pi }{4}+[\frac{(x-\frac{\pi }{4})}{1!}\cos \frac{\pi }{4}]-[\frac{(x-\frac{\pi }{4}{)}^2}{2!}\sin \frac{\pi }{4}]-[\frac{(x-\frac{\pi }{4}{)}^3}{3!}\cos \frac{\pi }{4}]+[\frac{(x-\frac{\pi }{4}{)}^4}{4!}\sin \frac{\pi }{4}]+.....+[\frac{(x-\frac{\pi }{4}{)}^{10}}{10!}{f}^{10}(\frac{\pi }{4})]$

where $f^{10}(\frac{\pi }{4})=-\sin (\frac{\pi }{4})$ (Please see the below Matlab code for more elaborate expansion)

$R_{11}(x)=\frac{1}{10!}\underset{t=\frac{\pi }{4}}{\overset{t=x}{\int }}(x-t{)}^{10}{f}^{11}(t)dt$

where $f^{11}\left(t\right)=-\cos \left(t\right)$ (Please see the below Matlab code for more elaborate expansion)

MATLAB Code:

To generate the equation for $P_n(x)$

p=0
for n = 0:10
syms x;
syms z;
f=sin(z);
g=diff(f,n);
z=(pi/4);
p=p+(((x-(pi/4))^n)/factorial(n))*g;
end

p=

sin(z)+(x-1/4*pi)*cos(z)-1/2*(x-1/4*pi)^2*sin(z)-1/6*(x-1/4*pi)^3*cos(z)+1/24*(x-1/4*pi)^4*sin(z)+1/120*(x-1/4*pi)^5*cos(z)-1/720*(x-1/4*pi)^6*sin(z)-1/5040*(x-1/4*pi)^7*cos(z)+1/40320*(x-1/4*pi)^8*sin(z)+1/362880*(x-1/4*pi)^9*cos(z)-1/3628800*(x-1/4*pi)^10*sin(z);

To generate the equation for $R_{n+1}(x)$

>> syms t
>> syms x
>> f=sin(x);
>> r= (1/factorial(10))*int(((x-t)^10)*diff(f,11),t,(pi/4),x);
>> r

r =

-1301357606610903/51946031311566097350656*cos(x)*(x^11-1/4194304*pi^11)+1301357606610903/4722366482869645213696*x*cos(x)*(x^10-1/1048576*pi^10)-6506788033054515/4722366482869645213696*x^2*cos(x)*(x^9-1/262144*pi^9)+19520364099163545/4722366482869645213696*x^3*cos(x)*(x^8-1/65536*pi^8)-19520364099163545/2361183241434822606848*x^4*cos(x)*(x^7-1/16384*pi^7)+27328509738828963/2361183241434822606848*x^5*cos(x)*(x^6-1/4096*pi^6)-27328509738828963/2361183241434822606848*x^6*cos(x)*(x^5-1/1024*pi^5)+19520364099163545/2361183241434822606848*x^7*cos(x)*(x^4-1/256*pi^4)-19520364099163545/4722366482869645213696*x^8*cos(x)*(x^3-1/64*pi^3)+6506788033054515/4722366482869645213696*x^9*cos(x)*(x^2-1/16*pi^2)-1301357606610903/4722366482869645213696*x^10*cos(x)*(x-1/4*pi)

To generate the graph for $x$ vs $y=f(x)=P_n(x)+R_{n+1}(x)$; where $x\in [0,\pi ]$

z=pi/4;
for i= 1:1:1000
x = ((i-1)/1000)*pi;
p=sin(z)+(x-1/4*pi)*cos(z)-1/2*(x-1/4*pi)^2*sin(z)-1/6*(x-1/4*pi)^3*cos(z)+1/24*(x-1/4*pi)^4*sin(z)+1/120*(x-1/4*pi)^5*cos(z)-1/720*(x-1/4*pi)^6*sin(z)-1/5040*(x-1/4*pi)^7*cos(z)+1/40320*(x-1/4*pi)^8*sin(z)+1/362880*(x-1/4*pi)^9*cos(z)-1/3628800*(x-1/4*pi)^10*sin(z);
r=-1301357606610903/51946031311566097350656*cos(x)*(x^11-1/4194304*pi^11)+1301357606610903/4722366482869645213696*x*cos(x)*(x^10-1/1048576*pi^10)-6506788033054515/4722366482869645213696*x^2*cos(x)*(x^9-1/262144*pi^9)+19520364099163545/4722366482869645213696*x^3*cos(x)*(x^8-1/65536*pi^8)-19520364099163545/2361183241434822606848*x^4*cos(x)*(x^7-1/16384*pi^7)+27328509738828963/2361183241434822606848*x^5*cos(x)*(x^6-1/4096*pi^6)-27328509738828963/2361183241434822606848*x^6*cos(x)*(x^5-1/1024*pi^5)+19520364099163545/2361183241434822606848*x^7*cos(x)*(x^4-1/256*pi^4)-19520364099163545/4722366482869645213696*x^8*cos(x)*(x^3-1/64*pi^3)+6506788033054515/4722366482869645213696*x^9*cos(x)*(x^2-1/16*pi^2)-1301357606610903/4722366482869645213696*x^10*cos(x)*(x-1/4*pi)
y=p+r;
plot(x,y);
hold on;
end

Solution for problem 7: Srikanth Madala 19:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Proofread problem 7: Egm6341.s10.team2.patodon 04:22, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Problem 8

Problem Statement

Pg. 6-5

$I=\underset{0}{\overset{1}{\int }}\frac{{\exp }^x-1}{x}dx$

Use 3 methods to find In:

1) Taylor Series Expansion, Fn 2) Composite Trapezoidal Rule 3) Composite Simpson Rule

for n=2,4,8 ... until the error is of order $10^{-6}$

Solution 1

1)Taylor Series Expansion

The goal is to perform the following integration,

$I=\underset{0}{\overset{1}{\int }}\frac{{\exp }^x-1}{x}dx$

The problem with this is that it is an indefinite integral, which must be rewritten in another way in order to analyze it. The method discussed here will be Taylor Series Expansion or McClaurin Series Expansion. The function can be rewritten as follows:

The Taylor Series Expansion for ${\exp }^x$

${\exp }^x=\sum _{j=0}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^j}{j!}=1+\sum _{j=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^j}{j!}$

${\exp }^x-1=1+\sum _{j=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^j}{j!}-1=\sum _{j=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^j}{j!}$

$\frac{ex{p}^x-1}{x}=\sum _{j=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^{j-1}}{j!}=f(x)$

Using this new definition for the function one can then integrate it directly as follows:

$I=\underset{0}{\overset{1}{\int }}\sum _{j=1}^n\frac{x^{j-1}}{j!}dx$

Integrating this for a value of n=2 yields the following:

$I=\underset{0}{\overset{1}{\int }}\sum _{j=1}^{n=2}\frac{x^{j-1}}{j!}dx$

$I=\underset{0}{\overset{1}{\int }}\frac{x^0}{1!}+\frac{x^1}{2!}dx={\left[x\right]}_0^1+{\left[\frac{x^2}{4}\right]}_0^1=1+\frac{1}{4}=1.25$

For n=4:

$I=\underset{0}{\overset{1}{\int }}\frac{x^0}{1!}+\frac{x^1}{2!}+\frac{x^2}{3!}+\frac{x^3}{4!}dx={\left[x\right]}_0^1+{\left[\frac{x^2}{4}\right]}_0^1+{\left[\frac{x^3}{18}\right]}_0^1+{\left[\frac{x^4}{96}\right]}_0^1=1+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{18}+\frac{1}{96}=1.3160$

The percent difference between the actual value of the integral (1.3179022) and the estimated value is found by:

$\left|\frac{estimate-actual}{actual}\right|\times 100\mathrm{\%}=\left|\frac{1.25-1.3179022}{1.3179022}\right|\times 100\mathrm{\%}=5.15\mathrm{\%}$

The following are the results for other values of n until the error is reduced to the power of $10^{-6}$

Template:Center topTaylor SeriesTemplate:Center bottom
n	Estimated Value	Percent Difference
n=2	1.2500000	5.152294305
n=4	1.3159722222	0.146443171
n=8	1.3179018152	2.91949E-05
n=16	1.3179021515	3.68355E-06
n=32	1.3179021515	3.68355E-06

Matlab Code used to generate the values for the table:

    function I =taylor(n)
    i=1;
    Itot=0;
    It=0;
    while i<=n
       if i==1
          Itot=1;
       else
            It=1/(factorial(i)*i);
       end
    Itot=Itot+It;
    i=i+1;
    end
    I=Itot;

Solution 2

2)Composite Trapezoidal Rule The formula used to analyze the integral for a function using the composite trapezoidal rule is as follows:

$\underset{a}{\overset{b}{\int }}F(x)dx=(b-a)\frac{f(x_0)+2\sum _{i=1}^{n-1}f(x_i)+f(x_n)}{2n}$

It is also necessary to state the following, using L'Hopitals Rule

$\underset{0}{\lim }\frac{{\exp }^x-1}{x}=1$

For n=2 the integration is approximated as follows:

$\underset{0}{\overset{1}{\int }}\frac{{\exp }^x-1}{x}dx$

$x(1)=.5x(2)=1$

$I=(1-0)\frac{f(x_0)+2f(x_1)+f(x_2)}{4}=(1)\frac{1+(2\times 1.2974)+1.7183}{4}=1.328$

The error is calculated by comparing it to the results obtained using the Taylor Series expansion, as follows:

$Error=\frac{|TrapezoidalValue-TaylorValue|}{\left|TaylorValue\right|}\times 100\mathrm{\%}=\frac{|1.328-1.3179|}{1.3179}\times 100\mathrm{\%}=.7664\mathrm{\%}$

This table displays the results for similar values:

Template:Center topComposite Trapezoidal RuleTemplate:Center bottom
n	Estimated Value	Percent Difference
n=2	1.3282917278	0.788338301
n=4	1.3205046195	0.197466812
n=8	1.3185530869	0.049388101
n=16	1.3180649052	0.012345774
n=32	1.3179428411	0.003083775
n=64	1.3179123240	0.000768187
n=128	1.3179046946	0.000189284
n=256	1.3179027872	4.45585E-05
n=512	1.3179023104	8.37696E-06
n=1024	1.3179021912	6.68424E-07

Matlab Code used to generate the values for the estimates:

    function I=ctrapz(n)
    i=0;
    Itot=0;
    It=0;
    It2=0;
    h=0;
    while i<=n
       if i==0
          Itot1=1;
       else if i<n
            h=1/n;
            It(i)=2*valu(h*i);
           else
               It2=valu(1);
           end
       end
    Itot=Itot1+sum(It)+It2;
    i=i+1;
    end
    I=Itot/(2*n);

    function F= valu(x);
    F=(exp(x)-1)/x;

Solution 3

The Composite Simpson's Rule

The rule is defined as follows:

$I_n=(b-a)\frac{f(x_0+4\sum _{i=1,3,5..}^{n-1}f(x_i)+2\sum _{j=2,4,6...}^{n-2}f(x_j)+f(x_n)}{3n}$

Using this definition the following is found:

Template:Center topComposite Simpson's RuleTemplate:Center bottom
n	Estimated Value	Percent Error
n=2	1.318008666	0.00807842
n=4	1.317908917	0.00050965
n=8	1.317902576	2.85304E-05
n=16	1.317902178	1.66813E-06

The Following MATLAB code was used to generate the values:

    function I = simpb(a,b,w)

    q=1;
    i=a;
    n=0;
    Sum=0;
    c=0;

    while n<w
        n=2^q;
        h=(a+b)/n;
    while i<=b
        fx=(exp(i)-1)/(i);
        if i==a
            Sum=1;
        else if i==b
                Sum=Sum+fx;
            else if i==(b-h)
                    Sum=Sum+(4*fx);
                else if rem(c,2)==0
                        Sum=Sum+(2*fx);
                    else
                        Sum=Sum+(4*fx);
                    end
                end
            end
        end
        c=c+1;
        i=i+h;
    end
    n
    In=Sum*(h/3);
    I=In;
    i=a;
    c=0;
    q=q+1;
    Sum=0;
    end

By Comparing all of the methods one is able to conclude that the most efficient method to numerically integrate was the composite Simpson's rule.

Solution for problem 8: Guillermo Varela

Problem 9

Problem Statement

Pg. 7-1

$\frac{\mathbf{[}{𝐞}^{𝐱}\mathbf{-}\mathrm{𝟏}\mathbf{]}}{x}=\frac{1}{x}[e^x-1]=f(x)$

1) Expand ${\exp }^x$ in Taylor Series w/ remainder:

$R(x)=\frac{(x-0{)}^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}exp[\zeta (x)]$

2) Find Taylor Series Expansion and Remainder of f(x). eq. 4 of p 6-3.

Solution

Given:

$P_n(x)=f(x_0)+\frac{(x-x_0)}{1!}{f}^{(1)}(x_0)+...+\frac{(x-x_0{)}^n}{n!}{f}^{(n)}(x_0)$

[equation 4 p 2-2]

$R(x)=\frac{(x-0{)}^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}exp[\zeta (x)]$

[equation 1 p 2-3]

Part 1

$P_n(x)=e^{x_0}+\frac{(x-x_0)}{1!}{e}^{x_0}+...+\frac{(x-x_0{)}^n}{n!}{e}^{x_0}$

for the case that $x_0=0$, we get,

$P_n(x)=1+\frac{(x)}{1!}+...+\frac{(x{)}^n}{n!}$

$P_n(x)$ =$\sum _{j=0}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^j}{j!}$

Using equation 1 p 2-3, we get the remainder as

$R_{n+1}(x)=\frac{(x-x_0{)}^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}{f}^{(n+1)}(\zeta (x))$

for $x_0=0$, we get

$R_{n+1}(x)=\frac{(x{)}^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}{f}^{(n+1)}(\zeta (x))$

finally, $f(x)=e^x=\sum _{j=0}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^j}{j!}+\frac{(x{)}^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}{f}^{(n+1)}(\zeta (x))=\sum _{j=0}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^j}{j!}+\frac{(x{)}^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}{e}^{(\zeta (x))}$

Part 2

$f(x)=\frac{1}{x}[e^x-1]$

$e^x=\sum _{j=0}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^j}{j!}=1+\frac{x}{1!}+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...+\frac{x^n}{n!}$

$\therefore [e^x-1]=\frac{x}{1!}+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...+\frac{x^n}{n!}$

dividing both sides by x we get,

$\frac{[e^x-1]}{x}=f(x)=\sum _{j=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^{j-1}}{j!}$

and remainder becomes

$R_{n+1}(x)=\frac{(x{)}^n}{(n+1)!}{f}^{(n+1)}(\zeta (x))$

since $x_0=0$, we have

$R_{n+1}(x)=\frac{(x{)}^n}{(n+1)!}{f}^{(n+1)}(\zeta (x)$ where $\zeta (x))ϵ[0,x]$

Finally,

$f(x)=\frac{[e^x-1]}{x}=\sum _{j=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^{j-1}}{j!}+\frac{(x{)}^n}{(n+1)!}{f}^{(n+1)}(\zeta (x))=\sum _{j=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\frac{x^{j-1}}{j!}+\frac{(x{)}^n}{(n+1)!}{e}^{(\zeta (x))}$

Solution for problem 9: Egm6341.s10.team2.niki 23:23, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Proofread problem 9:

Problem 10

Problem Statement

P. 8-2.

Use eq. 2 of pg. 8-2 to obtain eq. 1 of Pg. 7-1.

Solution

File:Egm6341.s10.Team2.Problem10Hw1.JPG

Solution for problem 10: Jiang Pengxiang

Proofread problem 10: Srikanth Madala 19:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Problem 11

Problem Statement

P. 8-3

show eq. 4 is equal to eq. 2 by expanding eq. 4.

Solution

Equation 2:

$\begin{array}{ccc}{p}_2(x_j)& =& f(x_j)\end{array}$

Equation 4:

$\begin{array}{ccc}{p}_2(x_j)& =& \sum _{i=0}^2{\vartheta }_i(x_j)f(x_i)Forj=0,1,2\end{array}$

Performing summation:

$\begin{array}{ccc}{p}_2(x_j)& =& \sum _{i=0}^2{\vartheta }_i(x_j)f(x_i)\\ & =& {\vartheta }_0(x_j)f(x_0)+{\vartheta }_1(x_j)f(x_1)+{\vartheta }_2(x_j)f(x_2)\end{array}$

Definition of Kronecker delta Meeting 8 Notes :

${\vartheta }_i(x_j)={\delta }_{ij}=\{\begin{array}{cc}1& i=j\\ 0& i\ne j\end{array}$

Therefore,

${\vartheta }_i(x_j)f(x_i)=0Fori\ne j$

${\vartheta }_i(x_j)f(x_i)=f(x_{i=j})Fori=j$

For $j=0,1,or2$, two of the three terms resulting from the summation over index-j are negated. Since two of the terms will have i where $i\ne j$ and therefore ${\vartheta }_i(x_j)$ equal to $0$ for those two terms and ${\vartheta }_i(x_j)$ equal to $1$ for the remaining one term where $i=j$.

Thus,

$p_2(x_j)=f(x_j)$

Solution for problem 11:
Egm6341.s10.team2.patodon 04:16, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Proofread problem 11:

Contributing Authors

--Niki Nachappa Chenanda Ganapathy 16:20, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

--Guillermo Varela 19:23, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

--Srikanth Madala 19:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

--Patrick O'Donoughue 20:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

--Jiang Pengxiang 21:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)<br/

Template:Center topProblem AssignmentsTemplate:Center bottom
Problem	Solution	Proofread
Problem 1	SM	GV
Problem 2	SM	PO
Problem 3	GV	NN
Problem 4	NN	JP
Problem 5	JP	SM
Problem 6	P0	GV
Problem 7	SM	PO
Problem 8	GV	NN
Problem 9	NN	JP
Problem 10	JP	SM
Problem 11	PO	GV