University of Florida/Eml4500/f08 Team Homework 3

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Homework 3

Derivation of Elemental Free-body Diagram with respect to the Global Coordinate System

k4x4(e)d4x1(e)=f4x1(e)

File:HW-3Picture1.jpg


k(e)[1111]{q1(e)q2(e)}={P1(e)P2(e)}

qi(e)= axial displacement of element 'e' at local node 'i'
Pi(e)= axial force of element 'e' at local node 'i'

We want to find the relationship between q(e) and d(e), and P(e) and F(e).

These relationships can be expressed in the form: q2x1(e)T2x4(e)=d4x1(e)

Consider the displacement vector of the local node 1 denoted by d1(e).

File:HW-3Picture2.jpg

d[1](e)=d1(e)i+d1(e)j

q1(e) = axial displacement of node 1 is the prthagonal projection of the displacement vector d1(e) of node 1 on the x~ axis of element 'e'.


q1(e)=d1(e)+i~

q1(e)=(d1(e)i+d2(e)j)+i~

q1(e)=d1(e)(ii~)+(d2(e)(ji~)

(ii~)=cosθ(e)=l(e)

(ii~)=sinθ(e)=m(e)

q1(e)=l(e)d1(e)+m(e)d2(e)

q1(e)=[l(e)m(e)]1x2{d1(e)d2(e)}2x1

Here we can see that q1(e) is a 1x1 scalar.


We do this for node 2 as well. q2(e)=[l(e)m(e)]1x2{d3(e)d4(e)}2x1

which leads us to:

{q1(e)q2(e)}=[l(e)m(e)0000l(e)m(e)]{d1(e)d2(e)d3(e)d4(e)}

where this is the equation we set out to derive, q2x1(e)T2x4(e)=d4x1(e)


Similarly, (same argument):
{P1(e)P2(e)}=I(e){f1(e)f2(e)f3(e)f4(e)}
Where P is a 2x1 matrix, T is a 2x4 matrix, and f is a 4x1 matrix.
This relationship is the same as saying
P_(e)=I(e)f_(e)
Recall the axial Fd relationship:

k^(e)q(e)=P(e)

where k is a 2x2 matrix, q is a 2x1 matrix, and P is a 2x1 matrix.

k^(e)(T_(e)d_(e))=(T_(e)f_(e))

q_(e)P_(e)

Goal: We want to have k(e)d(e)=f(e) so "move" Te from right side to the left side by pre multiplying equation by T(e)-1, the inverse of T(e). Unfortunately, T(e) is a rectangular matrix of the size 2x4 and cannot be inverted. Only square matricies can be inverted. To solve this issue, transpose T.
Ans:

(T_(e)Tk^_(e)T_(e))d_(e)=f_(e)

k_(e)d_(e)=f_(e)

k_(e)=T_(e)Tk^_(e)T_(e)

where k is on p6.1, k hat is on 12-2, and T is on 12-5.
Justification for (1): PVW see 10-1 for 1st applications of PVW, reduction of global FD relationship.

K_6x6d6x1=F_6x1K¯_2x2d¯_2x1=F¯_2x1



Remember: Why not solve as follows?

d_=K_1F

Used mathcad to try to solve K-1 and could not, due to singularity of K., i.e. the determinant of K=0 and thus K is not invertible. Recall that you need to computer 1detK to find K-1.

Why? For an unconstrained structure system, there are 3 possible rigid body mostion in 2-D (2 translational and 1 rotational).

HW: Find the eigenvalues of K and make observations about the number of eigenvalues.
Dyanmic eigenvalue problem Kv = λMv
Where K is the stiffness matrix, M is the mass.
Zero evaluation corresponds to zero stored elastic energy which means rigid body motion.

Using the Global Free-body Diagram Relationship

Using d3, and d4 in Kd=F and using boundary conditions to eliminate rows in the global displacement matrix we get:

[K1,3K1,4K2,3K2,4K3,3K3,4K4,3K4,4K5,3K5,4K6,3K6,4]6x2{d3d4}2x1={F1F2F3F4F5F6}6x1

Note: We really only need to do the computations for rows 1,2,5, and 6 to get F1,F2,F5,and F6 because computation from rows 3 and 4 gives the applied load which is already known.

Closing the Loop between FEM and Statics: Virtual Displacement

Two-bar truss system:

File:HW-3Picture3.jpg

Since our two-bar truss system is statically determinant because we can view element 1 and 2 as two force bodies. By statics, the reactions are known and therefore, so are the member forces P1(1), and P1(1).

We then compute axial displacement degrees of freedom. This is the amount of extension within the bars.

q2(1)=P1(1)k(1)=P2(1)k(1)=AC

q1(1)=0    (Node 1 is fixed)

q2(1)=P2(2)k(2)=AB

q2(2)=0    (Node 2 is fixed)

How do we back out the displacement DOFs of node 2 from above results?

File:HW-3Picture4.jpg
Note: The displacement of node 2 is in the direction of vector D.


Infinitesimal displacement (related to virtual displacement)

File:Infinitesimaldisp1.JPG

Global Free-Body Diagram showing Infinitesimal Displacements

AC=|P2(1)|k(1)=5.12433/4=6.8324

AB=|P1(1)|k(2)=6.27625=1.2552

Find (x,y) coordinates of B and C:

Point B:

x=ABcos135=1.2552*22=0.8876

y=ABsin135=1.2552*22=0.8876

Point C:

x=ACcos30=6.8324*32=5.917

y=ACsin30=6.8324*12=3.4162

We now have two unknowns, (XD,YD)

We need the equations for line AB and BC


Method for the Determination of the Slope between Two Arbitrary Points

File:Pqpicture.JPG

PQ Line Segment Diagram

PQ=(PQ)i~=(PQ)[cosθi+sinθj]=(xxP)i+(yyP)j

xxP=(PQ)cosθ

yyP=(PQ)sinθ

yyPxxP=tanθ

yyP=tanθ(xxP)

Equation for line perpendicular to PQ passing through P:

yyP=tan(θ+π2)(xxP)

Determination of (XD,YD)

Line Perpendicular to Point B:

y0.8876=tan225(x+0.8876)

y=x+1.7752

Line Perpendicular to Point C:

y3.4162=tan120(x5.917)

y=1.732x+13.665

Intersection at Point (XD,YD):

yD+1.732(yD1.7752)=13.665

yD=6.127

(xD+1.7752)=1.732xD+13.665

xD=4.352

AD=(xDxA)i+(yDyA)j

Simplification: xA=0,yA=0

AD=xDi+yDj

AD=4.352i+6.127j

AD=d3i+d4j

d3=4.352

d4=6.127

3-bar Truss System

File:3bartruss.JPG

3-bar Truss System

E(1)=2,A(1)=3,L(1)=5

E(2)=4,A(2)=1,L(2)=5

E(3)=3,A(3)=2,L(3)=10

θ(1)=30,θ(2)=30,θ(3)=45

P=30

Convenient Local Node Numbering:

File:3bartrusslocalnodes.JPG

3-bar Truss System Local Node Numbering


Template:Center top 3-Bar Truss System Template:Center bottom



File:Hw3-1.JPG



ΣFx = 0
ΣFy = 0
ΣMA = 0 (Trivial)

→ 2 equations, 3 unknowns → Statically Indeterminate


Question: How about MB? (3-D Explanation)

File:Hw3-2.JPG

MB=BA×F=BA×F

(for A' on line of action of \overline{F}


MB=(BA+AA)×F=BA×F+AA×F



Back to 3-bar truss:

Node A is in equilibrium:

i=03Fi=0


iMB,i=iBA'i×Fi


Ai' = any point on line of action of Fi

iMB,i=iBA'i×Fi=BA×i=0Fi=0



[K11K12K13K14K15K16K17K18K21K22K23K24K25K26K27K28K31K32K33K34K35K36K37K38K41K42K43K44K45K46K47K48K51K52K53K54K55K56K57K58K61K62K63K64K65K66K67K68K71K72K73K74K75K76K77K78K81K82K83K84K85K86K87K88]
=[k11(1)k12(1)k13(1)k14(1)0000k21(1)k22(1)k23(1)k24(1)0000k31(1)k32(1)(k33(1)+k11(2)+k11(3))(k34(1)+k12(2)+k12(3))k13(2)k14(2)k15(3)k16(3)k41(1)k42(1)(k43(1)+k21(2)+k21(3))(k44(1)+k22(2)+k22(3))k23(2)k24(2)k25(3)k26(3)00k31(2)k32(2)k33(2)k34(2)0000k41(2)k42(2)k43(2)k44(2)0000k51(3)k52(3)00k55(3)k56(3)00k61(3)k62(3)00k65(3)k66(3)]


MatLab Homework

Part of this assignment required the team to develop a MATLAB code that plots the deformed and un-deformed configurations of the two-bar truss system solved in class. The code is based on two models that were created by Dr. Vu-Quoc and X.G. Tan.



File:Plot for truss.GIF

The blue dashed line represents the un-deformed truss, while the solid red line shows the truss after it has been deformed.



Authors

Eml4500.f08.wiki1.oatley 20:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Eml4500.f08.wiki1.brannon 01:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Eml4500.f08.wiki1.ambrosio 21:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Eml4500.f08.wiki1.aguilar 20:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Eml4500.f08.wiki1.schaet 19:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Eml4500.f08.wiki1.handy 20:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Template:CourseCat